Back

ACE2 Homo-dimerization, Human Genomic variants and Interaction of Host Proteins Explain High Population Specific Differences in Outcomes of COVID19

Sharma, S.; Singh, I.; Haider, S.; Malik, M. Z.; Ponnusamy, K.; Rai, E.

2020-04-24 genetics
10.1101/2020.04.24.050534 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a positive single-stranded RNA virus that causes a highly contagious Corona Virus Disease (COVID19). Entry of SARS-CoV-2 in human cells depends on binding of the viral spike (S) proteins to cellular receptor Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and on S-protein priming by host cell serine protease TMPRSS2. Recently, COVID19 has been declared pandemic by World Health Organization (WHO) yet high differences in disease outcomes across countries have been seen. We provide evidences to explain these population-level differences. One of the key factors of entry of the virus in host cells presumably is because of differential interaction of viral proteins with host cell proteins due to different genetic backgrounds. Based on our findings, we conclude that a higher expression of ACE2 is facilitated by natural variations, acting as Expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs), with different frequencies in different populations. We suggest that high expression of ACE2 results in homo-dimerization, proving disadvantageous for TMPRSS2 mediated cleavage of ACE2; whereas, the monomeric ACE2 has higher preferential binding with SARS-CoV-2 S-Protein vis-a-vis its dimerized counterpart. Further, eQTLs in TMPRSS2 and natural structural variations in the gene may also result in differential outcomes towards priming of viral S-protein, a critical step for entry of the Virus in host cells. In addition, we suggest that several key host genes, like SLC6A19, ADAM17, RPS6, HNRNPA1, SUMO1, NACA, BTF3 and some other proteases as Cathepsins, might have a critical role. To conclude, understanding population specific differences in these genes may help in developing appropriate management strategies for COVID19 with better therapeutic interventions.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.3%
2
Journal of Virology
456 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
10.0%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 7%
10.0%
4
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
5
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
6
Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.3%
9
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
10
Virus Research
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
11
Journal of Biomedical Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
12
PLOS Pathogens
721 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
13
Virus Evolution
140 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
15
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
17
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
18
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
20
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
21
BMC Genomic Data
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
22
The FEBS Journal
78 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
25
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
26
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
28
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.7%
29
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Medical Research Archives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%