Back

Wisconsin April 2020 Election Not Associated with Increase in COVID-19 Infection Rates

Berry, A. C.; Mulekar, M. S.; Berry, B. B.

2020-04-28 public and global health
10.1101/2020.04.23.20074575 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundWisconsin (WI) held a primary election in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. Live voting at polls was allowed despite concern over increasing the spread of COVID-19. In addition to 1.1 million absentee ballots cast, 453,222 persons voted live. The purpose of our study was to determine if an increase in COVID-19 activity was associated with the election. MethodsUsing the voting age population for the United States (US), WI, and its 3 largest counties, and daily new COVID-19 case reports from various COVID-19 web-based dashboards, daily new case rates were calculated. With election day April 7, the incubation period included April 12-21. The new case activity in the rest of the US was compared with the Wisconsin activity during the incubation period. ResultsWI daily new case rates were lower than those of the rest of the US for the 10-day period before the election and remained lower during the post exposure incubation period. The ratio of Wisconsin new case rates to US new case rates was 0.34 WI: 1 US for the 10 days leading up to the election and declined to 0.28 WI: 1 US for the 10-day post-incubation period after the election. Similar analysis for Milwaukee county showed a pre-election ratio of 1.02 Milwaukee: 1 US and after the election the ratio was 0.63 Milwaukee: 1 US. Dane county had a pre-election ratio of 0.21 Dane: 1 US case, and it fell to 0.13 Dane: 1 US after the election. Waukesha county had a pre-election ratio of 0.27 Waukesha: 1 US case and that fell to 0.19 Waukesha: 1 US after the election. ConclusionsThere was no increase in COVID-19 new case daily rates observed for Wisconsin or its 3 largest counties following the election on April 7, 2020, as compared to the US, during the post-incubation interval period.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.2%
2
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
3
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.7%
4
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
6.3%
5
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
7
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.8%
8
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
9
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.3%
11
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
12
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
14
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
16
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
17
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
20
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%
23
Health Science Reports
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%