Back

Combining eye tracking with EEG: Effects of filter settings on EEG for trials containing task relevant eye-movements

Kulke, L.; Kulke, V.

2020-04-23 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.04.22.054882 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Co-registration of electroencephalography (EEG) and eye movements is becoming increasingly popular, as technology advances. This new method has several advantages, including the possibility of testing non-verbal populations and infants. However, eye movements can create artefacts in EEG data. Previous methods to remove eye-movement artefacts, have used high-pass filters before data processing. However, the role of filter settings for eye-artefact exclusion has not directly been investigated. The current study examined the effect of filter settings on EEG recorded in a dataset containing task-relevant eye movements. Part 1 models the effects of filters on eye-movement artifacts and part 2 demonstrates this effect on an EEG dataset containing task-relevant eye-movements. It shows that high-pass filters can lead to significant distortions and create artificial responses that are unrelated to the target. In conclusion, high-pass filter settings of 0.1 or lower can be recommended for EEG studies involving task-relevant eye movements. HighlightsO_LICo-registration of EEG and eye-tracking is gaining popularity C_LIO_LIHowever, eye movements can create artifacts in the EEG signal C_LIO_LIThe current paper models the effect of high pass filters on eye-movement artifacts C_LIO_LIHigh pass filters can induce large distortions in EEG data containing regular eye-movements C_LIO_LIThe distortion is affected by fixation duration and filter frequency C_LI

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.