Back

Elucidating the differences in the molecular mechanism of receptor binding between 2019-nCoV and the SARS-CoV viruses using computational tools

Nguyen, T. T.; Lai, H. T. T.; Nguyen, L. H.; Nguyen-Manh, D.; Kranjc Pietrucci, A. T.

2020-04-21 molecular biology
10.1101/2020.04.21.053009 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The outbreak of the 2019-nCoV coronavirus causing severe acute respiratory syndrome which can be fatal, especially in elderly population, has been declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization. Many biotechnology laboratories are rushing to develop therapeutic antibodies and antiviral drugs for treatment of this viral disease. The viral CoV spike (S) glycoprotein is one of the main targets for pharmacological intervention. Its receptor-binding domain (RBD) interacts with the human ACE2 receptor ensuring the entry of the viral genomes into the host cell. In this work, we report on the differences in the binding of the RBD of the previous coronavirus SARS-CoV and of the newer 2019-nCoV coronavirus to the human ACE2 receptor using atomistic molecular dynamics techniques. Our results show major mutations in the 2019-nCoV RBD with respect to the SARS-CoV RBD occurring at the interface of RBD-ACE2 complex. These mutations make the 2019-nCoV RBD protein backbone much more flexible, hydrophobic interactions are reduced and additional polar/charged residues appear at the interface. We observe that higher flexibility of the 2019-nCoV RBD with respect to the SARS-CoV RBD leads to a bigger binding interface between the 2019-nCoV RBD and ACE2 and to about 20% more contacts between them in comparison with SARS-CoV. Taken together, the 2019-nCoV RBD shows more stable binding interface and higher binding affinity for the ACE2 receptor. The mutations not only stabilize the binding interface, they also lead to overall more stable 2019-nCoV RBD protein structure, even far from the binding interface. Our results on the molecular differences in the binding between the two viruses can provide important inputs for development of appropriate antiviral treatments of the new viruses, addressing the necessity of ongoing pandemics.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
14.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 9%
8.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.3%
4
Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
5
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
6
Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
8
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
9
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.4%
12
Journal of Computational Chemistry
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
14
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
15
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
16
Infection, Genetics and Evolution
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.4%
19
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
20
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
21
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
22
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
28 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
23
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
24
Journal of Biosciences
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
25
Virology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
26
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
28
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
Microbial Pathogenesis
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
30
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%