Back

Estimated surge in hospitalization and intensive care due to the novel coronavirus pandemic in the Greater Toronto Area, Canada: a mathematical modeling study with application at two local area hospitals

Mishra, S.; Wang, L.; Ma, H.; Yiu, K. C.; Paterson, J. M.; Kim, E.; Schull, M. J.; Pequegnat, V.; Lee, A.; Ishiguro, L.; Coomes, E.; Chan, A.; Downing, M.; Landsman, D.; Straus, S.; Muller, M.

2020-04-23 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.04.20.20073023
Show abstract

BackgroundA hospital-level pandemic response involves anticipating local surge in healthcare needs. MethodsWe developed a mechanistic transmission model to simulate a range of scenarios of COVID-19 spread in the Greater Toronto Area. We estimated healthcare needs against 2019 daily admissions using healthcare administrative data, and applied outputs to hospital-specific data on catchment, capacity, and baseline non-COVID admissions to estimate potential surge by day 90 at two hospitals (St. Michaels Hospital [SMH] and St. Josephs Health Centre [SJHC]). We examined fast/large, default, and slow/small epidemics, wherein the default scenario (R0 2.4) resembled the early trajectory in the GTA. ResultsWithout further interventions, even a slow/small epidemic exceeded the citys daily ICU capacity for patients without COVID-19. In a pessimistic default scenario, for SMH and SJHC to remain below their non-ICU bed capacity, they would need to reduce non-COVID inpatient care by 70% and 58% respectively. SMH would need to create 86 new ICU beds, while SJHC would need to reduce its ICU beds for non-COVID care by 72%. Uncertainty in local epidemiological features was more influential than uncertainty in clinical severity. If physical distancing reduces contacts by 20%, maximizing the diagnostic capacity or syndromic diagnoses at the community-level could avoid a surge at each hospital. InterpretationAs distribution of the citys surge varies across hospitals over time, efforts are needed to plan and redistribute ICU care to where demand is expected. Hospital-level surge is based on community-level transmission, with community-level strategies key to mitigating each hospitals surge.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Canadian Medical Association Journal
based on 15 papers
Top 0.1%
11.0%
2
CMAJ Open
based on 12 papers
Top 0.1%
10.9%
3
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 59%
7.4%
4
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 0.3%
6.3%
5
Epidemics
based on 96 papers
Top 2%
5.2%
6
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 25%
4.4%
7
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 4%
4.4%
8
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 23%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
9
Royal Society Open Science
based on 49 papers
Top 2%
2.5%
10
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 63%
2.4%
11
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
based on 45 papers
Top 3%
2.4%
12
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 12%
2.2%
13
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 13%
1.8%
14
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 9%
1.7%
15
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 11%
1.7%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
based on 141 papers
Top 6%
1.7%
17
Emerging Infectious Diseases
based on 84 papers
Top 7%
1.5%
18
Annals of Internal Medicine
based on 27 papers
Top 0.8%
1.5%
19
PLOS Global Public Health
based on 287 papers
Top 18%
1.3%
20
Infectious Disease Modelling
based on 50 papers
Top 5%
1.2%
21
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
based on 54 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
based on 12 papers
Top 1.0%
0.8%
23
The Lancet Public Health
based on 20 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 26%
0.8%
25
Journal of Travel Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
26
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
based on 57 papers
Top 7%
0.8%
27
Science Advances
based on 52 papers
Top 7%
0.7%
28
Annals of Epidemiology
based on 19 papers
Top 2%
0.7%