Back

Reconstruction of Bone Defect Based on the Fusion of Osteoblasts and MSM/HA/PLGA Porous Scaffolds

huo, w.; Wu, X.; zheng, Y.; Cheng, J.; Xu, Q.; Li, P.; Han, C.; Li, Z.

2020-04-15 bioengineering
10.1101/2020.04.15.042713 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Reconstruction of bone defect is one of the difficult problems in orthopedic treatment, and bone tissue scaffold implantation is the most promising direction of bone defect reconstruction. In this study, we used the combination of HA (Hydroxyapatite) and PLGA [Poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid)] in the construction of polymer scaffolds, and introduced bioactive MSM (Methyl sulfonyl methane) into polymer scaffolds to prepare porous scaffolds. The osteoblasts, isolated and cultured in vitro, were seeded in the porous scaffolds to construct tissue-engineered scaffolds. Meanwhile, the model of rabbit radius defect was constructed to evaluate the biological aspects of five tissue-engineered scaffolds, which provided experimental basis for the application of the porous scaffolds in bone tissue engineering. The SEM characterization showed the pore size of porous scaffolds was uniform and the porosity was about 90%. The results of contact Angle testing suggested that the hydrophobic porous scaffold surface could effectively promote cell adhesion and cell proliferation, while mechanical property test showed good machinability. The results of drug loading and release efficiency of MSM showed that porous scaffolds could load MSM efficiently and prolong the release time of MSM. In vitro incubation of porous scaffolds and osteoblasts showed that the addition of a small quantity of MSM could promote the infiltration and proliferation of osteoblasts on the porous scaffolds. Similar results were obtained by implanting the tissue-engineered scaffolds, fused with the osteoblasts and MSM/HA/PLGA porous scaffolds, into the rabbit radius defect, which provided experimental basis for the application of the MSM/HA/PLGA porous scaffolds in bone tissue engineering.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.9%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.4%
4
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.9%
7
RSC Advances
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
8
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
10
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
11
Chemical Engineering Journal
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
13
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
15
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
16
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
17
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
18
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
19
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
20
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
21
Journal of Advanced Research
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
22
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
23
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
24
Cell Reports Physical Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
25
Life Sciences
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
26
Stem Cell Research & Therapy
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
27
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
29
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
30
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%