Estimate of Covid-19 prevalence using imperfect data
Rudnicki, W. R.; Piliszek, R.
Show abstract
The real number of people who were truly infected with SARS-CoV-2, is certainly significantly larger than the official record. Few countries have tracking and testing procedures that are sufficiently robust to discover nearly all infections. In most countries they are inadequate, hence the true extent of the pandemic is unknown. The current study proposes the estimate of the COVID-19 extent for countries with sufficiently high number of deaths and cases. The estimate is based on a simple model of mortality. This model was developed for a reference country with a large number of cases and high intensity of COVID-19 testing. The model is then applied to compute apparent mortality in the target and reference countries. The number of cases in the target country is then estimated assuming constant underlying true mortality. The estimate of cases in most countries is significantly higher than the official record. As of April 12, 2020, the global estimate is 5.2 million compared to 1.8 million in the official record. The models developed in this study are available at covid-model.net. The model ignores several factors that are known to influence mortality, such as the demographics and health condition of population, state of epidemic and sociological differences between countries. While the model is rough, it nevertheless provides a unified approach to producing a systematic global estimate of the extent of the COVID-19 epidemic and can be useful for its monitoring.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Extended compartmental model for modeling COVID-19 epidemic in Slovenia 94%
- Pareto-based evaluation of national responses to COVID-19 pandemic shows that saving lives and protecting economy are non-trade-off objectives 94%
- Model Based Estimation of the SARS-CoV-2 Immunization Level in Austria and Consequences for Herd Immunity Effects 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using proper mean generation intervals in modelling of COVID-19 94%
- Adaptive time-dependent priors and Bayesian inference to evaluate SARS-CoV-2 public health measures validated on 31 countries 94%
- Uncovering COVID-19 Transmission Tree: Identifying Traced and Untraced Infections in an Infection Network 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the undetected infections in the Covid-19 outbreak by harnessing capture-recapture methods 92%
- Impact of reproduction number on multiwave spreading dynamics of COVID-19 with temporary immunity : a mathematical model 92%
- Evaluating COVID-19 reporting data in the context of testing strategies across 31 LMICs 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.