Back

Flow over seal whiskers: significance of geometricfeatures on force and frequency response

Lyons, K. M.; Murphy, C. T.; Franck, J. A.

2020-04-14 biophysics
10.1101/2020.04.13.039750 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The complex undulated geometry of seal whiskers has been shown to substantially modify the turbulent structures directly downstream, resulting in a reduction of hydrodynamic forces as well as modified vortex-induced-vibration response when compared with smooth whiskers. Although the unique hydrodynamic response has been well documented, an understanding of the fluid flow effects from each geometric feature remains incomplete. In this computational investigation, nondimensional geometric parameters of the seal whisker morphology are defined in terms of their hydrodynamic relevance, such that wavelength, aspect ratio, undulation amplitudes, symmetry and undulation off-set can be varied independently of one another. A two-factor fractional factorial design of experiments procedure is used to create 16 unique geometries, each of which dramatically amplifies or attenuates the geometric parameters compared with the baseline model. The flow over each unique topography is computed with a large-eddy simulation at a Reynolds number of 500 with respect to the mean whisker thickness and the effects on force and frequency are recorded. The results determine the specific fluid flow impact of each geometric feature which will inform both biologists and engineers who seek to understand the impact of whisker morphology or lay out a framework for biomimetic design of undulated structures.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Physics of Fluids
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.4%
2
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.1%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.8%
5
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
6
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
9
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.1%
11
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.9%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.9%
13
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Physics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
17
Soft Matter
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
20
The Journal of Chemical Physics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
European Biophysics Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
23
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.7%
24
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
26
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
28
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%