Back

Water and nutrient cycling regulation functions in forest ecosystems: a comparison between native forests and exotic fast-growing tree species plantations in tropical highlands

Leon-Pelaez, J. D.; Villegas, J. C.; Amador-Perez, J. A.

2020-04-13 ecology
10.1101/2020.04.13.038976 bioRxiv
Show abstract

An improved understanding of ecosystem functions is increasingly needed as ecosystem management moves towards optimizing their capacity to provide services to society. Such a task requires the characterization of ecosystem functions in strategic systems such as tropical mountain forests, which are also subject to pressure due to both global and local environmental changes. In particular, transformation of native forests into pastures or agriculture, has been regarded as the type of transformation with the largest effects in ecosystem regulating and provision functions. However, the effects of other transformations such as those associated with replacement of native with planted forests, have been less studied. To evaluate the effect of forest type on key-ecosystem functions related to water resources, we studied the dynamics of rainfall partitioning and nutrient circulation on a suite of representative forest types in neotropical mountain systems: two plantations of exotic fast-growing species and two types of native forests. Our results illustrate that, when considered in a per-basal unit area, water transmission to the forest floor is significantly higher in both native forests. Similarly, native forests are more effective on circulating nutrients on the ecosystem as they are better adapted to oligotrophic soils such as those occurring in tropical mountains. These results suggest that the replacement of native forests with exotic tree plantations can potentially impact hydrological regulation and the nutrient cycling in these high Andean lands, affecting both directly and indirectly the capacity of ecosystems to produce services to society.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.6%
2
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
3
Forest Ecology and Management
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
4
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Ecological Indicators
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Tree Physiology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.8%
8
Hydrobiologia
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
9
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
11
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
12
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
14
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
16
Biotropica
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
17
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
18
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
19
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
21
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
22
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Sustainability
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
24
Plant and Soil
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%