A novel specific artificial intelligence-based method to identify COVID-19 cases using simple blood exams
Soares, F.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe SARS-CoV-2 virus responsible for COVID-19 poses a significant challenge to healthcare systems worldwide. Despite governmental initiatives aimed at containing the spread of the disease, several countries are experiencing unmanageable increases in the demand for ICU beds, medical equipment, and larger testing capacity. Efficient COVID-19 diagnosis enables healthcare systems to provide better care for patients while protecting caregivers from the disease. However, many countries are constrained by the limited amount of test kits available, lack of equipment and trained professionals. In the case of patients visiting emergency rooms (ERs) with a suspect of COVID-19, prompt diagnosis may improve the outcome and even provide information for efficient hospital management. In such a context, a quick, inexpensive and readily available test to perform an initial triage in ERs could help to smooth patient flow, provide better patient care, and reduce the backlog of exams. MethodsIn this Case-control quantitative study, we developed a strategy backed by artificial intelligence to perform an initial screening of suspect COVID-19 patients. We developed a machine learning classifier that takes widely available simple blood exams as input and classifies samples as likely to be positive (having SARS-CoV-2) or negative (not having SARS-CoV-2). Based on this initial classification, positive cases can be referred for further highly sensitive testing (e.g. CT scan, or specific antibodies). We used publicly available data from the Albert Einstein Hospital in Brazil from 5,644 patients. Focusing on simple blood exam figures as main predictors, a sample of 599 subjects that had the fewest missing values for 16 common exams were selected. From these 599 patients, 81 tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (determined by RT-PCR). Based on the reduced dataset, we built an artificial intelligence classification framework, ER-CoV, aiming at determining if suspect patients arriving in ER were likely to be negative for SARS-CoV-2, that is, to predict if that suspect patient is negative for COVID-19. The primary goal of this investigation is to develop a classifier with high specificity and high negative predictive values, with reasonable sensitivity. FindingsWe identified that our AI framework achieved an average specificity of 85.98% [95%CI: 84.94 - 86.84] and negative predictive value (NPV) of 94.92% [95%CI: 94.37% - 95.37%]. Those values are completely aligned with our goal of providing an effective low-cost system to triage suspect patients in ERs. As for sensitivity, our model achieved an average of 70.25% [95%CI: 66.57% - 73.12%] and positive predictive value (PPV) of 44.96% [95%CI: 43.15% - 46.87%]. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was 86.78% [95%CI: 85.65% - 87.90%]. An error analysis (inspection of which patients were misclassified) identified that, on average, 28% of the false negative results would have been hospitalized anyway; thus the model is making mistakes for severe cases that would not be overlooked, partially mitigating the fact that the test is not highly sensitive. All code for our AI model, called ER-CoV is publicly available at https://github.com/soares-f/ER-CoV. InterpretationBased on the capacity of our model to accurately predict which cases are negative from suspect patients arriving in emergency rooms, we envision that this framework may play an important role in patient triage. Probably the most important outcome is related to testing availability, which at this point is extremely low in many countries. Considering the achieved specificity, we could reduce by at least 90% the number of SARS-CoV-2 tests performed in emergency rooms, with around 5% chance of getting a false negative. The second important outcome is related to patient management in hospitals. Patients predicted as positive by our framework could be immediately separated from other patients while waiting for the results of confirmatory tests. This could reduce the spread rate within hospitals since in many of them all suspect cases are kept in the same ward. In Brazil, where the data was collected, rate infection is starting to quickly spread and the lead time of a SARS-CoV-2 may be up to 2 weeks.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- On the Analysis of Mortality Risk Factors for Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: a Data-driven Study Using the Major Brazilian Database 93%
- Identification of high-risk COVID-19 patients using machine learning 93%
- REPLICCAR II Study: Data Quality Audit in the Paulista Cardiovascular Surgery Registry 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of Sepsis Mortality in ICU Patients Using Machine Learning Methods 94%
- On the predictability of postoperative complications for cancer patients: a Portuguese cohort study 93%
- Development of a data-driven COVID-19 prognostication tool to inform triage and step-down care for hospitalised patients in Hong Kong: A population based cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A multipurpose machine learning approach to predict COVID-19 negative prognosis in Sao Paulo, Brazil 95%
- Early risk assessment for COVID-19 patients from emergency department data using machine learning 93%
- A Syndromic Surveillance Tool to Detect Anomalous Clusters of COVID-19 Symptoms in the United States 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Initial Experience in Predicting the Risk of Hospitalization of 496 Outpatients with COVID-19 Using a Telemedicine Risk Assessment Tool 92%
- Performance of an artificial intelligence-based smartphone app for guided reading of SARS-CoV-2 lateral-flow immunoassays 91%
- A Multivariate Forecasting Model for the COVID-19 Hospital Census Based on Local Infection Incidence 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using Automated-Machine Learning to Predict COVID-19 Patient Survival: Identify Influential Biomarkers 93%
- Machine Learning to Predict Mortality and Critical Events in COVID-19 Positive New York City Patients 92%
- Clinical Characteristics And Prognostic Factors For ICU Admission Of Patients With COVID-19 Using Machine Learning And Natural Language Processing 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.