Standardization and Age-Distribution of COVID-19: Implications for Variability in Case Fatality and Outbreak Identification
Fisman, D.; Greer, A.; Tuite, A.
Show abstract
BackgroundEpidemiological data from the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated variability in attack rates by age, and country-to-country variability in case fatality ratio (CFR). ObjectiveTo use direct and indirect standardization for insights into the impact of age-specific under-reporting on between-country variability in CFR, and apparent size of COVID-19 epidemics. DesignPost-hoc secondary data analysis ("case studies"), and mathematical modeling. SettingChina, global. InterventionsNone. MeasurementsData were extracted from a sentinel epidemiological study by the Chinese Center for Disease Control (CCDC) that describes attack rates and CFR for COVID-19 in China prior to February 12, 2020. Standardized morbidity ratios (SMR) were used to impute missing cases and adjust CFR. Age-specific attack rates and CFR were applied to different countries with differing age structures (Italy, Japan, Indonesia, and Egypt), in order to generate estimates for CFR, apparent epidemic size, and time to outbreak recognition for identical age-specific attack rates. ResultsSMR demonstrated that 50-70% of cases were likely missed during the Chinese epidemic. Adjustment for under-recognition of younger cases decreased CFR from 2.4% to 0.8% (assuming 50% case ascertainment in older individuals). Standardizing the Chinese epidemic to countries with older populations (Italy, and Japan) resulted in larger apparent epidemic sizes, higher CFR and earlier outbreak recognition. The opposite effect was demonstrated for countries with younger populations (Indonesia, and Egypt). LimitationsSecondary data analysis based on a single country at an early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic, with no attempt to incorporate second order effects (ICU saturation) on CFR. ConclusionDirect and indirect standardization are simple tools that provide key insights into between-country variation in the apparent size and severity of COVID-19 epidemics. FundingThe research was supported by a grant to DNF from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (2019 COVID-19 rapid researching funding OV4-170360).
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Monitoring for outbreak associated excess mortality in an African city: Detection limits in Antananarivo, Madagascar 92%
- Country differences in transmissibility, age distribution and case-fatality of SARS-CoV-2: a global ecological analysis 92%
- The burden of active infection and anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in the general population: Results from a statewide survey in Karnataka, India 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the Impact of the Covid-19 Pandemic on US Mortality: A County-Level Analysis 90%
- Information nudges for influenza vaccination: Evidence from a large-scale cluster-randomized controlled trial 90%
- Estimation of SARS-CoV-2 mortality during the early stages of an epidemic: a modeling study in Hubei, China, and six regions in Europe 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evolving epidemiology of novel coronavirus diseases 2019 and possible interruption of local transmission outside Hubei Province in China: a descriptive and modeling study 90%
- Pay-it-forward to improve influenza vaccine uptake and public engagement among children and older adults in China 89%
- Vaccine effectiveness of two and three doses of BNT162b2 and CoronaVac against COVID-19 in Hong Kong 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Beyond Deaths per Capita: Comparative CoViD-19 Mortality Indicators 92%
- Social disparities in the first wave of COVID-19 infections in Germany: A county-scale explainable machine learning approach 90%
- Predicting Under-five mortality across 21 Low and Middle-Income Countries using Deep Learning Methods 90%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.