The first month of the COVID-19 outbreak in 46 sub-Saharan African countries; a comparative analysis of growth rates
Prince, M. J.; Alem, A.; Chibanda, D.; Fairall, L.; Fekadu, A.; Hanlon, C.; Lund, C.; Leather, A. J.; Petersen, I.; Verhey, R.; Wurie, H.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe COVID-19 outbreak in sub-Saharan African countries started after those in Asia, Europe and North America, on 28th February 2020. The susceptibility to infection of populations in that region has been debated. Outbreaks on the scale of those seen elsewhere would pose substantial challenges. There are reasons for concern that transmission may be high and difficult to control, rapidly exceeding capacity to meet the needs for hospitalization and critical care. MethodsWe obtained data on daily new confirmed cases for all 46 countries from the World Health Organization, and used these to model and visualize growth trajectories using an AutoRegressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model. We then estimated doubling times from growth rates estimated from Poisson regression models, and by back counting from the most recent observation. We also calculated the time from 1st to 50th case, and the time from 5th to 100th case. These indicators were compared with the same summary indicators of growth at the same stage of the outbreak in highly affected European countries. ResultsKenya was the only country with clear evidence of exponential growth. Nineteen countries had either reported no cases, were in the first few days of the outbreak, or had reported fewer than 10 cases over a period of two or more weeks. For the remaining 27 countries we identified four growth patterns: slow linear growth, more rapid linear growth, variable growth patterns over the course of the outbreak, and early signs of possible exponential growth. For those in the last three groups, doubling times ranged from 3 to 4 days, times from 1st to 50th case from 12 to 29 days, and from 5th to 100th case from eight to 15 days. These early indicators are comparable to those in European countries that have gone on to have substantial outbreaks, and time to 50th case was shorter suggesting lesser effectiveness of contact-tracing and quarantine in the early phase. ConclusionThe 46 sub-Saharan African countries, home to over one billion people, are at a tipping point with clear potential for the outbreak to follow a similar course as in HIC in the global north. Radical population-level physical distancing measures may be required, but their impact on poor, disadvantaged and vulnerable people and communities need mitigating. Health systems in the region need urgent technical and material support, with testing, personal protection, and hospital/ critical care.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The toll of COVID-19 on African children: A descriptive analysis on the COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality among the pediatric population in Sub-Saharan Africa 96%
- SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence in pregnant women during the first three COVID-19 waves in The Gambia 92%
- The burden of active infection and anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in the general population: Results from a statewide survey in Karnataka, India 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The last frontier for global Non-Communicable Disease action: the Emergency Department - a cross-sectional study from East Africa 94%
- Using Google Health Trends to investigate COVID-19 incidence in Africa 94%
- Perceptions and compliance with COVID-19 preventive measures in Southern and Central regions of Mozambique: a quantitative in-person household survey in the districts of Manhiça and Quelimane 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mpox knowledge and perception in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- Evaluating the Risk of Conflict on Recent Ebola Outbreaks in Guinea and the Democratic Republic of the Congo 95%
- Evidence of Resiliency in Maternal Health Services and Outcomes in Kono District, Sierra Leone during the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Observational Study 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.