Back

BRAVE-NET: Fully Automated Arterial Brain Vessel Segmentation In Patients with Cerebrovascular Disease

Hilbert, A.; Madai, V. I.; Akay, E. M.; Aydin, O. U.; Behland, J.; Sobesky, J.; Galinovic, I.; Khalil, A. A.; Taha, A. A.; Würfel, J.; Dusek, P.; Niendorf, T.; Fiebach, J. B.; Frey, D.; Livne, M.

2020-04-11 neurology
10.1101/2020.04.08.20057570
Show abstract

IntroductionArterial brain vessel assessment is crucial for the diagnostic process in patients with cerebrovascular disease. Noninvasive neuroimaging techniques such as time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) imaging are applied in the clinical routine to depict arteries. They are, however, only visually assessed. Fully automated vessel segmentation integrated into the clinical routine could facilitate the time-critical diagnosis of vessel abnormalities and might facilitate the identification of valuable biomarkers for cerebrovascular events. In the present work, we developed and validated a new deep learning model for vessel segmentation, coined BRAVE-NET, on a large aggregated dataset of patients with cerebrovascular diseases. MethodsBRAVE-NET is a multiscale 3-D convolutional neural network (CNN) model developed on a dataset of 264 patients from 3 different studies enrolling patients with cerebrovascular diseases. A context path, dually capturing high- and low-resolution volumes, and deep supervision were implemented. The BRAVE-NET model was compared to a baseline Unet model and variants with only context paths and deep supervision, respectively. The models were developed and validated using high-quality manual labels as ground truth. Next to precision and recall, the performance was assessed quantitatively by Dice coefficient (DSC); average Hausdorff distance (AVD); 95- percentile Hausdorff distance (95HD) and via visual qualitative rating. ResultsThe BRAVE-NET performance surpassed the other models for arterial brain vessel segmentation with a DSC = 0.931, AVD = 0.165 and 95HD = 29.153. The BRAVE-NET model was also the most resistant towards false labelings as revealed by the visual analysis. The performance improvement is primarily attributed to the integration of the multiscaling context path into the 3-D Unet and to a lesser extent to the deep supervision architectural component. DiscussionWe present a new state-of-the-art of arterial brain vessel segmentation tailored to cerebrovascular pathology. We provide an extensive experimental validation of the model using a large aggregated dataset encompassing a large variability of cerebrovascular disease. The framework provides the technological foundation for improving the clinical workflow and can serve as a biomarker extraction tool in cerebrovascular diseases.

Matching journals

1
NeuroImage
Elsevier BV · based on 36 published papers
Top 0.1%
73× avg
2
Human Brain Mapping
Wiley · based on 53 published papers
Top 0.4%
40× avg
3
IEEE Access
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) · based on 11 published papers
#1
100× avg
4
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 28%
6.5%
5
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 74 published papers
Top 3%
8.4× avg
6
Scientific Data
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 30 published papers
Top 0.3%
30× avg
7
npj Digital Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 85 published papers
Top 5%
5.1× avg
8
NeuroImage: Clinical
Elsevier BV · based on 77 published papers
Top 4%
7.2× avg
9
Nature Communications
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 483 published papers
Top 25%
2.5%
10
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
Frontiers Media SA · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.7%
28× avg
11
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Frontiers Media SA · based on 29 published papers
Top 2%
12× avg
12
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 89%
1.6%
13
Neuro-Oncology Advances
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 14 published papers
Top 1%
12× avg
14
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Wiley · based on 84 published papers
Top 4%
2.5× avg
15
PLOS Digital Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 88 published papers
Top 9%
2.5× avg
16
Journal of the American Heart Association
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 92 published papers
Top 9%
1.8× avg
17
Communications Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 63 published papers
Top 1%
7.7× avg
18
Stroke
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 29 published papers
Top 3%
5.6× avg
19
Epilepsia
Wiley · based on 27 published papers
Top 1%
6.6× avg
20
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Elsevier BV · based on 39 published papers
Top 5%
4.7× avg
21
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Wiley · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
11× avg
22
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 36 published papers
Top 7%
2.2× avg
23
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
SAGE Publications · based on 31 published papers
Top 3%
3.8× avg
24
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 12 published papers
Top 2%
8.4× avg
25
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Wiley · based on 22 published papers
Top 4%
5.6× avg
26
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
Elsevier BV · based on 14 published papers
Top 3%
7.9× avg
27
Brain
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 69 published papers
Top 8%
1.7× avg
28
Brain Communications
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 79 published papers
Top 7%
2.1× avg
29
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 31 published papers
Top 4%
3.0× avg