A first study on the impact of current and future control measures on the spread of COVID-19 in Germany
Barbarossa, M. V.; Fuhrmann, J.; Heidecke, J.; Vinod Varma, H.; Castelletti, N.; Meinke, J. H.; Krieg, S.; Lippert, T.
Show abstract
The novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), identified in China at the end of December 2019 and causing the disease COVID-19, has meanwhile led to outbreaks all over the globe, with about 571,700 confirmed cases and about 26,500 deaths as of March 28th, 2020. We present here the preliminary results of a mathematical study directed at informing on the possible application or lifting of control measures in Germany. The developed mathematical models allow to study the spread of COVID-19 among the population in Germany and to asses the impact of non-pharmaceutical interventions.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Uncertainty and Inconsistency of COVID-19 Non-Pharmaceutical Intervention Effects with Multiple Competitive Statistical Models 96%
- Strategies for COVID-19 vaccination under a shortage scenario: a geo-stochastic modelling approach 95%
- Modelling the interplay of SARS-CoV-2 variants in the United Kingdom 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Real time estimation of the risk of death from novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infection: Inference using exported cases 94%
- Risk assessment of novel coronavirus COVID-19outbreaks outside China 93%
- Modelling the evolution of COVID-19 in high-incidence European countries and regions: estimated number of infections and impact of past and future intervention measures 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- An improved mathematical prediction of the time evolution of the Covid-19 Pandemic in Italy, with Monte Carlo simulations and error analyses 95%
- Prediction of the time evolution of the Covid-19 Pandemic in Italy by a Gauss Error Function and Monte Carlo simulations 94%
- DNA Mutations via Chern-Simons Current 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.