Back

Rate and synchrony at the level of the auditory nerve are not sufficient to account for behaviorally estimated cochlear compression - a modeling study

Encina-Llamas, G.; Lindahl, J. C. T.; Epp, B.

2020-04-10 otolaryngology
10.1101/2020.04.06.20055855 medRxiv
Show abstract

Methods based on psychoacoustical forward masking have been proposed to estimate the local compressive growth of the basilar membrane (BM). This results from normal outer hair cells function, which leads to level-dependent amplification of BM vibration. Psychoacoustical methods assume that cochlear processing can be isolated from the response of the overall system, that sensitivity is dominated by the tonotopic location of the probe and that the effect of forward masking is different for on- and off-characteristic frequency (CF) maskers. In the present study, a computational model of the auditory nerve (AN) in combination with signal detection theory was used to test these assumptions. The underlying idea was that, for the BM compression to be estimated using psychoacoustics, enough information should be preserved at the level of the AN, because this forms an information bottleneck in the ascending auditory pathway. The simulated AN responses were quantified in terms of rate and synchrony for different types of AN fibers and CFs. The results show that, when using a low-intensity probe, local activity at the tonotopic location of the probe frequency is the dominant contributor to sensitivity in the healthy auditory system. However, on- and off-CF maskers produced similar forward masking onto the probe, which was mainly encoded by high- and to little extent by medium-spontaneous rate fibers. The simulation results suggested that the estimate of compression based on the behavioral experiments cannot be derived from sensitivity at the level of the AN but may require additional contributions, supporting previous physiological studies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
2
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
3
Hearing Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
Applied Sciences
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.3%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.3%
6
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.9%
8
Ear & Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
9
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
10
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.6%
11
Trends in Hearing
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
12
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.9%
13
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.5%
17
Neuroscience Research
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
20
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
22
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%