COVID-19 pandemic: Impact of lockdown, contact and non-contact transmissions on infection dynamics
Roy, S.
Show abstract
COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic has virtually locked down the entire world of human population, and through its rapid and unstoppable spread COVID-19 has essentially compartmentalised the population merely into susceptible, exposed, infected and recovered classes. Adapting the classical epidemic modelling framework, two distinct routes of COVID-19 transmission are incorporated into a model: (a) direct person-to-person contact transmission, and (b) indirect airborne and fomites-driven transmission. The indirect non-contact transmission route needs to explored in models of COVID-19 spread, because evidences show that this route of transmission is entirely viable with hugely uncertain level of relative contribution. This theoretical study based on model simulations demonstrates the following: (1) Not incorporating indirect transmission route in the model leads to underestimation of the basic reproduction number, and hence will impact on the COVID-19 mitigation decisions; (2) Lockdown measures can suppress the primary infection peak, but will lead to a secondary peak whose relative strength and time of occurrence depend on the success and duration of the lockdown measures; (3) To make lockdown effective, a considerable level of reduction in both contact and non-contact transmission rates over a long period is required; (4) To bring down the infection cases below any hypothetical health-care capacity, reduction of non-contact transmission rate is key, and hence active measures should be taken to reduce non-contact transmission (e.g., extensive uses of areal and aerosol disinfectant in public spaces to improve contaminated surfaces and air); (5) Any premature withdrawal of lockdown following the sign of a brief retracement in the infection cases can backfire, and can lead to a quicker, sharper and higher secondary peak, due to reactivation of the two transmission routes. Based on these results, this study recommends that any exit policy from lockdown, should take into account the level of transmission reduction in both routes, the absolute scale of which will vary among countries depending on their health-service capacity, but should be computed using accurate time-series data on infection cases and transmission rates.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Is increased mortality by multiple exposures to COVID-19 an overseen factor when aiming for herd immunity? 96%
- Modeling the initial phase of COVID-19 epidemic: The role of age and disease severity in the Basque Country, Spain 96%
- Impact of exposure frequency on disease burden of the common cold - a mathematical modeling perspective 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Incorporating the mutational landscape of SARS-COV-2 variants and case-dependent vaccination rates into epidemic models 96%
- Understanding the transmission pathways of Lassa Fever: a mathematical modeling approach 95%
- Estimate of the rate of unreported COVID-19 cases during the first outbreak in Rio de Janeiro 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Projection of Healthcare Demand in Germany and Switzerland Urged by Omicron Wave (January-March 2022) 96%
- Modeling the early phase of the Belgian COVID-19 epidemic using a stochastic compartmental model and studying its implied future trajectories 95%
- Covid-19 Belgium: Extended SEIR-QD model with nursing homes and long-term scenarios-based forecasts 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.