Back

Covid-19 excess deaths in the United States through July 2020

Wetzler, H. P.; Wetzler, E. A.

2020-04-06 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.04.02.20051532 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundIt has been suggested that many of those who died from COVID-19 were older, had more comorbidities, and would have died within a short period anyway. We estimated the number and percent of excess deaths due to COVID-19 In April 2020 in the United States, New York City, and Michigan. MethodsFor each locale we calculated attributable fractions in the exposed comparing observed COVID-19 deaths and expected deaths. In addition, we estimated the number of months it would take for the excess deaths to occur without the virus and the proportions of the populations that were infected leading to the April deaths. We compared the excess deaths from the attributable fraction method to those obtained by comparing weekly deaths in 2019 and 2020. ResultsUsing an assumed infection fatality rate of 1%, the percentages of excess deaths were 95%, 97%, and 95% in the US, NYC, and MI equivalent to 54,560; 14,951; and 3,338 deaths, respectively. Absent the virus these deaths would have occurred over 21.0, 29.2, and 18.4 months in the respective locations. An estimated 1.7% of the US population was infected between March 13 and April 10, 2020. Nearly 19% were infected in NYC. ConclusionsOver 75% of COVID-19 deaths in April 2020 were excess deaths meaning they would not have occurred in April without SARS-CoV-2 but would have been spread out over the ensuing 18 to 29 months. Confirmed cases in the US under-report the actual number of infections by at least an order of magnitude. Excess death numbers calculated using the attributable fraction in the exposed are similar to those obtained from weekly mortality reports.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.9%
2
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.8%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 24%
7.0%
4
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.5%
6
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
7
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.8%
8
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
10
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
11
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
12
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
13
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
14
EClinicalMedicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
15
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
17
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
18
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
19
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
20
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
21
Canadian Medical Association Journal
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
24
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
25
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
27
Journal of Clinical Virology Plus
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.6%
28
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%