Recursive Convolutional Neural Networks for Epigenomics
Symeonidi, A.; Nikolaou, A.; Johannes, F.; Christlein, V.
Show abstract
Deep learning methods have proved to be powerful classification tools in the fields of structural and functional genomics. In this paper, we introduce a Recursive Convolutional Neural Networks (RCNN) for the analysis of epigenomic data. We focus on the task of predicting gene expression from the intensity of histone modifications. The proposed RCNN architecture can be applied to data of an arbitrary size, and has a single meta-parameter that quantifies the models capacity, thus making it flexible for experimenting. The proposed architecture outperforms state-of-the-art systems, while having several orders of magnitude fewer parameters.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- MFmap: A semi-supervised generative model matching cell lines to tumours and cancer subtypes 94%
- A novel machine learning-based approach for the detection and analysis of spontaneous synaptic currents 94%
- Semantic Segmentation of HeLa Cells: An Objective Comparison between one Traditional Algorithm and Three Deep-Learning Architectures 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid Reconstruction of Time-varying Gene Regulatory Networks with Limited Main Memory 97%
- Latent representation of the human pan-celltype epigenome through a deep recurrent neural network 95%
- PALLAS: Penalized mAximum LikeLihood and pArticle Swarms for inference of gene regulatory networks from time series data 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Unsupervised generative and graph representation learning for modelling cell differentiation 95%
- DeepInsight-3D for precision oncology: an improved anti-cancer drug response prediction from high-dimensional multi-omics data with convolutional neural networks 95%
- Finding disease modules for cancer and COVID-19 in gene co-expression networks with the Core&Peel method 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.