Determination of daily reproduction numbers of SARS-CoV2 based on death cases suggests more rapid initial spread in Italy and the United States
Ensser, A.; Ueberla, K.
Show abstract
Population density, behaviour and cultural habits strongly influence the spread of pathogens. Consequently, key epidemiological parameters may vary from country to country. Confirmed COVID-19 cases in in China have been used to estimate those parameters, that vary largely (reviewed in 1). The estimates also depend on testing frequency and case definitions that are prone to change during ongoing epidemics, providing additional uncertainties. The rise in fatal cases due to SARS-CoV2 could be a more reliable parameter, since missing of deaths is less likely. In the absence of changes in the management of severe COVID-19 cases, the rise in death cases should be proportional to the rise in virus infections. Although the fluctuating low numbers of fatal cases very early in the epidemic may lead to some uncertainty, more than 100 deaths per day are reported since 10.03.2020 in Italy and since 21.03.2020 in the US. Therefore, the dynamics of deaths were analysed to estimate the daily reproduction numbers (Rt) and the effectiveness of control measures. Thus, our analysis provides evidence that basic epidemiological parameters differ between countries to an extent compromising epidemiological predictions of the pandemic. It also suggests that suppression of spread in Italy and the US may be more difficult to achieve. Although we assume that variations in social behaviour are responsible for the different estimates of R0, selection of more rapidly spreading variants of SARS-CoV-2 cannot be excluded. Despite uncertainty in the reliability of the data used and lack of information on possible changes in the effectiveness of registration of COVID-19 deaths during the observation period, our findings should be considered as a working hypothesis demanding further investigations. As the number of deaths rapidly increases worldwide, we encourage more sophisticated modelling of the epidemic based on the dynamics of death cases by experts in the field.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Pareto-based evaluation of national responses to COVID-19 pandemic shows that saving lives and protecting economy are non-trade-off objectives 92%
- Estimation of R0 for the spread of SARS-CoV-2 in Germany from Excess Mortality 92%
- Modelling the interplay of SARS-CoV-2 variants in the United Kingdom 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Accounting for imported cases in estimating the time-varying reproductive number of COVID-19 89%
- The impact of co-circulating pathogens on SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 surveillance: How concurrent epidemics may decrease true SARS-CoV-2 percent positivity 88%
- Time scales of human monkeypox transmission in the Netherlands 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Preliminary estimating the reproduction number of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak in Republic of Korea and Italy by 5 March 2020 91%
- Impact of reproduction number on multiwave spreading dynamics of COVID-19 with temporary immunity : a mathematical model 90%
- Estimation of the asymptomatic ratio of novel coronavirus infections (COVID-19) 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trajectories of COVID-19: a longitudinal analysis of many nations and subnational regions 92%
- Modeling the effect of vaccination strategies in an Excel spreadsheet: The rate of vaccination, and not only the vaccination coverage, is a determinant for containing COVID-19 in urban areas 91%
- The Effect of Gender on Covid-19 Infections and Mortality in Germany: Insights From Age- and Sex-Specific Modelling of Contact Rates, Infections, and Deaths 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.