Back

Combining mass spectrometric platforms for lipidome investigation - Application to the characterisation of disruptions in the lipid profile of pig serum upon β agonist treatment

Marchand, J.; Guitton, Y.; Martineau, E.; Royer, A.-L.; Bagloma, D.; Le Bizec, B.; Giraudeau, P.; Dervilly, G.

2020-03-22 biochemistry
10.1101/2020.03.20.997189 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In the last decade, many mass spectrometric fingerprinting methods dedicated to lipidomics have been proposed: either non-targeted approaches, coupled with annotation methods, or targeted strategies, aiming at specifically monitoring a limited number of substances. In a general public health perspective and through a strategy combining non-targeted and targeted lipidomics MS-based approaches, this study aims at identifying disrupted patterns in serum lipidome upon growth promoter treatment in pig and evaluating the relative contributions of the three platforms involved. Pig serum samples collected during an animal experiment involving control and treated animals, whose food had been supplemented with ractopamine, were extracted and characterised using three MS strategies: Non-targeted RP LC-HRMS; the targeted Lipidyzer platform (differential ion mobility associated with shotgun lipidomics) and a homemade LC-HRMS triglyceride platform. The three different platforms showed complementarity insight into lipid characterisation, which, applied to a selected set of samples, enabled highlighting specific lipid profile patterns involving various lipid classes, mainly in relation with cholesterol esters, sphingomyelins, lactosylceramide, phosphatidylcholines and triglycerides. Thanks to the combination of both non-targeted and targeted MS approaches, the exploration of various compartments of the pig serum lipidome could be performed, including commonly characterised lipids (Lipidyzer), triglyceride isomers (Triglyceride platform) -whose accurate analysis was considered an analytical challenge, and unique lipid features (non-targeted LC-HRMS). Thanks to their respective characteristics, the complementarity of the three tools could be demonstrated for public health purposes, with enhanced lipidome coverage, level of characterisation and applicability.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
3
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
6.4%
5
Metabolites
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.2%
7
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
8
Metabolomics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
9
The Analyst
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
10
Talanta
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
11
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
Journal of Proteomics
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
13
Food Chemistry
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.1%
15
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
16
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.2%
18
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
19
Frontiers in Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
21
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Biomolecules
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
SoftwareX
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
25
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
378 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%