Fine-mapping and QTL tissue-sharing information improve causal gene identification and transcriptome prediction performance
Barbeira, A. N.; Liang, Y.; Bonazzola, R.; Wang, G.; Wheeler, H. E.; Melia, O. J.; Aguet, F.; The GTEx Consortium, ; Ardlie, K. G.; Wen, X.; Im, H. K.
Show abstract
The integration of transcriptomic studies and GWAS (genome-wide association studies) via imputed expression has seen extensive application in recent years, enabling the functional characterization and causal gene prioritization of GWAS loci. However, the techniques for imputing transcriptomic traits from DNA variation remain underdeveloped. Furthermore, associations found when linking eQTL studies to complex traits through methods like PrediXcan can lead to false positives due to linkage disequilibrium between distinct causal variants. Therefore, the best prediction performance models may not necessarily lead to more reliable causal gene discovery. With the goal of improving discoveries without increasing false positives, we develop and compare multiple transcriptomic imputation approaches using the most recent GTEx release of expression and splicing data on 17,382 RNA-sequencing samples from 948 post-mortem donors in 54 tissues. We find that informing prediction models with posterior causal probability from fine-mapping (dap-g) and borrowing information across tissues (mashr) lead to better performance in terms of number and proportion of significant associations that are colocalized and the proportion of silver standard genes identified as indicated by precision-recall and ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curves. All prediction models are made publicly available at predictdb.org. Author summaryIntegrating molecular biology information with genome-wide association studies (GWAS) sheds light on the mechanisms tying genetic variation to complex traits. However, associations found when linking eQTL studies to complex traits through methods like PrediXcan can lead to false positives due to linkage disequilibrium of distinct causal variants. By integrating fine-mapping information into the models, and leveraging the widespread tissue-sharing of eQTLs, we improve the proportion of likely causal genes among significant gene-trait associations, as well as the prediction of "ground truth" genes.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Joint Modeling of Effect Sizes for Two Correlated Traits: Characterizing Trait Properties to Enhance Polygenic Risk Prediction 96%
- Leveraging expression from multiple tissues using sparse canonical correlation analysis (sCCA) and aggregate tests improves the power of transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) 96%
- Meta-imputation of transcriptome from genotypes across multiple datasets using summary-level data. 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Primo: integration of multiple GWAS and omics QTL summary statistics for elucidation of molecular mechanisms of trait-associated SNPs and detection of pleiotropy in complex traits 96%
- ClipperQTL: ultrafast and powerful eGene identification method 95%
- Enhancing sensitivity and controlling false discovery rate in somatic indel discovery 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sparse Multitask group Lasso for Genome-Wide Association Studies 96%
- Biological networks and GWAS: comparing and combining network methods to understand the genetics of familial breast cancer susceptibility in the GENESIS study 95%
- Improving the coverage of credible sets in Bayesian genetic fine-mapping 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.