Back

Microbial isolation in English participants in the UK Biobank cohort: comparison with the general population

Hilton, B.; Wilson, D.; O'Connell, A.-M.; Ironmonger, D.; Rudkin, J. K.; Allen, N.; Wyllie, D.

2020-03-20 infectious diseases
10.1101/2020.03.18.20038281 medRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding the genetic and environmental risk factors for serious bacterial infections in ageing populations remains incomplete. Utilising the UK Biobank (UKB), a prospective cohort study of 500,000 adults aged 40-69 years at recruitment (2006-2010), could help address this. We assess the feasibility of linking an England-wide dataset of microbiological isolations to UKB participants, to enable characterisation of microbial infections within the UKB Cohort. Microbiological infections occurring in patients in England, as recorded in the Public Health England Second Generation Surveillance System (SGSS), were linked to UKB participants using pseudonymised identifiers. By January 2015, ascertainment of laboratory reports from UKB participants by SGSS was estimated at 98%. 4.5% of English UKB participants had a positive microbiological isolate in 2015. Half of UKB isolates came from 12 laboratories, and 70% from 21 laboratories. Incidence rate ratios for microbial isolation, which is indicative of serious infection, from the UKB cohort relative to the comparably aged general population ranged from 0.6 to 1, compatible with the previously described healthy participant bias in UKB. Data on microbial isolations can be linked to UKB participants from January 2015 onwards. This linked data would offer new opportunities for research into infectious disease in older individuals.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.1%
2
Nature Aging
51 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.3%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.9%
4
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
5
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.4%
7
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
8
Frontiers in Aging
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
9
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
10
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
12
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.5%
15
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
16
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
20
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
The Lancet
16 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
25
The British Journal of Psychiatry
21 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
26
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
27
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.7%
28
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
29
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
30
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%