The prevention of nosocomial SARS-CoV2 transmission in endoscopy: a systematic review of recommendations within gastroenterology to identify best practice.
Ong, J.; Cross, G. B.; Dan, Y. Y.
Show abstract
Endoscopy generates aerosol droplets and fomites, thereby increasing the risk of SARS-CoV2 transmission to healthcare workers and uninfected patients within endoscopy departments. Despite the sharp rise in the incidence of COVID-19, authoritative recommendations to limit the spread of SARS-CoV2 within gastrointestinal endoscopy units are lacking. Therefore, with the primary aim of identifying best practice and scrutinizing its supporting evidence, we conducted a systematic review of literature for articles published between 1 January 2002 and 15 March 2020 in five databases relating to both the current SARS-CoV2 and the previous SARS-CoV outbreaks. Official websites for gastroenterology and endoscopy societies in the 15 most affected countries were also searched. Unfortunately, a paucity of high quality data and heterogeneity of recommendations between countries was observed. Interestingly, not all countries advocated the postponement of non-urgent or elective procedures. Recommendations for patient screening and personal protective equipment were commonly featured in all recommendations but specifics varied. Only 32% (9/28) of all gastroenterology and endoscopy societies issued guidance on endoscopy in the COVID-19 pandemic. In conclusion, stronger evidence to inform current practice and robust guidelines are urgently needed to prevent the transmission of SARS-CoV2 in gastrointestinal endoscopy departments worldwide.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-centre derivation and validation of a colitis-associated colorectal cancer risk prediction web-tool 91%
- Gastrointestinal symptoms as Covid-19 onset in hospitalized Italian patients 90%
- Sphincterotomy for Biliary Sphincter of Oddi Disorder and idiopathic Acute Recurrent Pancreatitis: THE RESPOND LONGITUDINAL COHORT 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic Review Protocol of aetiology of mechanical bowel obstruction in Low-and-middle income countries: Has anything changed in the last two decades? 90%
- "GERPACYST- The Trial Protocol Of The Prospective, Multicenter, Interdisciplinary German Pancreas Club Cyst Registry" 89%
- An effect of the COVID-19 pandemic: significantly more complicated appendicitis due to delayed presentation of patients! 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Surgery & COVID-19: A rapid scoping review of the impact of COVID-19 on surgical services during public health emergencies 89%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on gastrointestinal infection trends in England, February – July 2020 88%
- Cohort profile: The Swedish Inception Cohort in inflammatory bowel disease (SIC-IBD) 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.