Back

Implementation of a pre- and in-scan system to minimize head motion in pediatric participants undergoing fMRI scans

Horien, C.; Fontenelle, S.; Joseph, K.; Powell, N.; Nutor, C.; Fortes, D.; Butler, M.; Powell, K.; Macris, D.; Lee, K.; McPartland, J. C.; Volkmar, F. R.; Scheinost, D.; Chawarska, K.; Constable, R. T.

2020-03-05 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.03.04.975417 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPerforming fMRI scans of children can be a difficult task, as participants tend to move while being scanned. Head motion represents a significant confound in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) connectivity analyses, and methods to limit the impact of movement on data quality are needed. One approach has been to use shorter MRI protocols, though this potentially reduces the reliability of the results. ObjectiveHere we describe steps we have taken to limit head motion in an ongoing fMRI study of children undergoing a 60 minute MRI scan protocol. Specifically, we have used a mock scan protocol that trains participants to lie still while being scanned. We provide a detailed protocol and describe other in-scanner measures we have implemented, including an incentive system and the use of a weighted blanket. Materials and methodsParticipants who received a formal mock scan (n = 12) were compared to participants who had an informal mock scan (n = 7). A replication group of participants (n = 16), including five with autism spectrum disorder, who received a formal mock scan were also compared to the informal mock scan group. The primary measure of interest was the mean frame-to-frame displacement across eight functional runs during the fMRI protocol. ResultsParticipants in the formal mock scan and replication group tended to exhibit more low-motion functional scans than the informal mock scan group (P < 0.05). Across different functional scan conditions (i.e. while watching movie clips, performing an attention task, and during resting-state scans), effect sizes tended to be large (Hedges g > 0.8). ConclusionResults indicate that with appropriate measures, it is possible to achieve low-motion fMRI data in younger participants undergoing a long scan protocol.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Aperture Neuro
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
2
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
9.2%
3
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
8.5%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.5%
5
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
7
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
9
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
10
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Brain Connectivity
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
12
Neuroimage: Reports
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Neuroimaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
16
Brain Imaging and Behavior
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
18
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
19
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
20
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
22
The Cerebellum
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
23
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
24
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
25
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
36 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
28
Brain Structure and Function
83 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
29
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Journal of Neuroscience Research
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%