Environmental DNA sampling in a terrestrial environment: methods to detect a critically endangered frog and a global pathogen
Burns, T. J.; Clemann, N.; van Rooyen, A. R.; Scheele, B. C.; Weeks, A. R.; Driscoll, D. A.
Show abstract
Environmental DNA techniques have become established as a useful tool for biological monitoring and are used extensively to determine species presence in aquatic systems. However, their application in terrestrial systems has been more limited, likely in part due to difficulties in choosing where to sample and ensuring that collected DNA reflects current species presence. We developed methods to sample eDNA in the terrestrial environment and trialled them under controlled and field conditions. We targeted three species, an elusive critically endangered frog, an abundant non-threatened frog, and the globally distributed amphibian skin pathogen chytrid fungus, which has been implicated in the decline of over 500 amphibian species. We used a sandpaper-sampling surface to trap DNA. After sampling, we washed the surface and filtered the wash water to gather material for DNA extraction and subsequent qPCR. Our controlled condition experiments demonstrated that frog and chytrid fungus DNA was detectable after as few as five contacts between a frog and the sampling surface. Furthermore, this DNA remained detectable after two weeks in cool, shaded, outdoor conditions. Our field experiments demonstrated that these techniques were transferable to natural habitats, where we detected both the common and rare amphibian target species, as well as chytrid fungus. Field sampling eDNA results were broadly consistent with those derived from conventional survey methods. Our methods have potential application in non-invasive sampling of amphibians and other species in terrestrial systems, broadening the applicability of eDNA techniques for species detection and monitoring.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Targeted Airborne eDNA Detection of Pest Wallabies: Effects of Sampler Type and Distance 96%
- Generating and testing ecological hypotheses at the pondscape with environmental DNA metabarcoding: a case study on a threatened amphibian 95%
- Metabarcoding unsorted kick-samples facilitates macroinvertebrate-based biomonitoring with increased taxonomic resolution, while outperforming environmental DNA 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Proving a negative; estimating species 'Confidence in Absence for Decision-Making' (CIADM) using environmental DNA monitoring 94%
- Reducing environmentally mediated transmission to moderate impacts of an emerging wildlife disease 94%
- Fishing for mammals: landscape-level monitoring of terrestrial and semi-aquatic communities using eDNA from lotic ecosystems 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pool choice in a vertical landscape: tadpole rearing site flexibility in phytotelm-breeding frogs 94%
- A new multiplexed magnetic-capture - droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) tool for monitoring wildlife population health and pathogen surveillance 93%
- DNA metabarcoding successfully quantifies relative abundances of arthropod taxa in songbird diets: a validation study using camera-recorded diets 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Environmental DNA monitoring of waterfowl reveals community changes during migration 94%
- Environmental risk factors associated with the presence of Mycobacterium ulcerans in Victoria, Australia 94%
- Life-cycle mediated effects of urbanization on parasite communities in the estuarine fish, Fundulus heteroclitus 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.