Back

Groups Of Species Responding To Soil And Light In The Cerrado

Tolentino, G.; Maguas, C.; Magnago, L.; Buttschardt, T.; Meira-Neto, J. A. A.

2020-02-20 ecology
10.1101/2020.02.20.955955 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AimsThe Cerrado is a rich tropical savanna in plant species and to understand how key functional traits respond to soil variables can help to understand this hotspot functioning. This work aimed to answer i) whether the Cerrado tree species respond to soil by functional traits, ii) how the functional traits respond to soil variation in the Cerrado, and iii) whether the functional traits responses are interconnected. MethodsWe used an RLQ method to associate soil variables to functional traits and GLMs for additional analysis. We used the nitrogen-fixing character as categorical trait and maximum plant height, maximum stem diameter, stem elongation, leaf nitrogen, leaf carbon, leaf C/N, leaf d15N and leaf d 13C as continuous traits. ResultsThe RLQ showed that tree species responded to the soil variables with differences between nitrogen-fixing species and other species. The increase of CEC and decrease of aluminium saturation induced an increase of SLA and of stem elongation. CEC and aluminium saturation did not influence the leaf N% and C%. The increase of soil inorganic nitrogen is associated to an increase of leaf N% and of leaf C%. The C/N ratio explained negatively the {delta}13C and the stem elongation variation. Nitrogen fixing species presented low C/N ratios and high {delta}13C. ConclusionsThe relative disassociation of the variation of SLA and stem elongation (mostly driven by CEC and aluminium variation) from the variation of N% and C% (mostly associated with inorganic nitrogen variation) can be a result of enhanced water use efficiency in N-enriched plants.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.