Transdiagnostic neurocognitive endophenotypes in major psychiatric illness
Holla, B.; Dayal, P.; Das, A.; Bhattacharya, M.; Manjula, V.; Ithal, D.; Dalachander, S.; Mahadevan, J.; Nadella, R. K.; Sreeraj, V. S.; Benegal, V.; Reddy, J. Y. C.; Mehta, U. M.; Viswanath, B.; ADBS Consortium,
Show abstract
We aimed to characterize potential transdiagnostic neurocognitive endophenotypes in a large cohort of multiplex families affected with two or more individuals having a major psychiatric illness(MPI) i.e., schizophrenia(SCZ), bipolar disorder(BPAD), substance use disorders(SUD) and obsessive-compulsive disorder(OCD). We recruited 640 individuals that included 256 affected individuals with MPI, 227 of their unaffected first-degree relatives(FDR) and 157 population healthy-controls(PHC). Neurocognitive battery included assessments of executive function, working memory, social cognition, verbal learning and recall. Linear mixed effects models were applied to the neurocognitive components to examine their transdiagnostic and endophenotype status after accounting for demographic and family variables. We also examined the relationship of cognitive domains with diagnosis-specific Family History Density score(FHD). The deficits in cognitive flexibility, working memory and social cognition were transdiagnostic; processing speed was impaired in SCZ and BPAD groups while verbal learning and recall in SCZ, BPAD and SUD groups. These deficits with the exception of social cognition, worsened with age and parental education had protective effect. The unaffected FDRs had deficits in all the domains except processing speed in comparison to PHC; social cognition deficits were comparable to affected individuals. The diagnosis-specific FHD analysis showed that deficits in cognitive flexibility, working memory and social cognition were endophenotypes across disorders. Evaluation of neurocognitive functions across multiple affected individuals in a large multiplex family-based cross-disorder cohort, has the potential to elucidate transdiagnostic as well as endophenotype vulnerabilities to psychiatric illness. This study adds to the emerging conceptualization of psychiatric illness as a combination of both diagnosis-specific and transdiagnostic markers.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cerebral cortical alterations in adolescent early-onset psychosis: a surface-based morphometry mega-analysis 96%
- Splitting Schizophrenia: Divergent Cognitive and Educational Outcomes Revealed by Genomic Structural Equation Modelling. 96%
- Interrelations Between Dopaminergic-, GABAergic- and Glutamatergic Neurotransmitters in Antipsychotic-Naïve Psychosis Patients and the Association to Initial Treatment Response 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Isolating the genetic component of mania in bipolar disorder 96%
- Computational modelling of EEG and fMRI paradigms reveals a consistent loss of pyramidal cell synaptic gain in schizophrenia 94%
- Striatal functional connectivity in psychosis relapse: A comparison between antipsychotic adherent and non-adherent patients at the time of relapse 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic liability for schizophrenia and childhood psychopathology in the general population 95%
- Central oxidative stress and early vocational outcomes in first episode psychosis: A 7-Tesla Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy study of glutathione 94%
- Orbitofrontal-striatal structural alterations linked to negative symptoms at different stages of the schizophrenia spectrum 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pan T cells, Helper T cells, and Regulatory T cells are Associated with Negative Symptoms in Persons with Anti-Gliadin Antibody Positive Schizophrenia and Related Disorders 96%
- Dopamine D1 receptor availability is not associated with delusional ideation measures of psychosis proneness 95%
- Moderate to severe negative symptoms predict low risk of symptoms worsening in schizophrenia patients in CATIE 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.