Back

Computational Modeling of Anisotropic Fatigue Behavior of Cancellous Bone under Uniaxial and Multiaxial Loading

Januddi, F.; Harun, M. N.; Abdullah, J.; Mostakhdemin, M.; Syahrom, A.

2020-02-12 bioengineering
10.1101/2020.02.12.945352 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The present study reports the anisotropy effects of uniaxial and multiaxial loading on cancellous bone in order to mimic true physiological conditions as well as pathological reactions and thereby provides improved data that represents clinical and real life conditions. Cancellous bone samples were CT-scanned for morphological analysis and model construction. The models were then computationally loaded on three different directions; horizontal, vertical, and at 45{degrees}. Lower BV/TV, Tb.Th, and Conn.D resulted in lower number of cycles to failure, regardless to the loading conditions. However, the number of cycles to failure was found to be negatively correlated to the value of structural model index. Dramatic increased in effective plastic strain and decrease in cycles to failure were demonstrated by the cancellous bone models under multiaxial loading. The reduction of fatigue life was five times lower in multiaxial condition in comparison to the fatigue life under uniaxial loading. Off-axis orientation effect on the fatigue life of the trabecular bone was demonstrated the worst in horizontal trabecular bone model. Effective plastic strain was recorded the highest in horizontal model, while the model at 45{degrees} demonstrated 1.6 times higher effective plastic strain than the vertical ones. This is due to several numbers of thin trabeculae which are susceptible to fatigue at higher stress concentration. In conclusion, the anisotropic effect of uniaxial and multiaxial loading onto the mechanical behaviour of bovine cancellous bone was demonstrated throughout this study. It is apparent that multiaxial with off-axis forces are important to be considered as the loading direction manifests the fatigue lifetime of cancellous bone.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
12.1%
3
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.8%
5
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
6
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
7
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
8
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.5%
9
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
10
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
11
Bone
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
12
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
JBMR Plus
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
16
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
17
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
18
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
19
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.2%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.2%
21
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
24
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%
25
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%