Back

Fluctuation, correlation and perturbation-response behavior of nature-made and artificial nanobodies

Hacisuleyman, A.; Erman, B.; Erkip, A.; Erman, B.

2020-02-06 biophysics
10.1101/2020.02.06.936856 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Nanobodies, like other antibodies bind their targets through complementarity determining regions (CDRs). Improving nanobody-antigen binding affinities by introducing mutations in these CDRs is critical for biotechnological applications. However, any mutation is expected to introduce changes in the behavior of the protein, such as fluctuations of residues, correlation of fluctuations of residue pairs, response of a residue to perturbation of another. Most importantly, the nanoscale dynamics of the protein may change. In these respects, the problem is similar to the general problem of dynamic allostery, a perturbation at one site affecting the response at another site. Using the Gaussian Network Model of proteins, we show that CDR mutations indeed modify the fluctuation profile and dynamics of the nanobody. Effects are not confined to CDR regions but extend throughout the full structure. We introduce a computational scheme where fluctuations of a residue are perturbed by a force and response amplitude and response time of the remaining residues are determined. Response to a perturbation of a residue shows a synchronous and an asynchronous component. The model is used to quantify the effects of mutation on protein dynamics: highly perturbable residues and highly responsive residues of the nanobody are determined. Residues whose perturbation has no effect on protein behavior may also be determined with the present model. Three known nanobodies produced by nature are used as an illustrative example and their various modifications which we generated by CDR residue mutations are analyzed.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
33.2%
2
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.4%
3
Physical Review E
95 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
5
The European Physical Journal Plus
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.3%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
8
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.6%
9
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
10
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
Entropy
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
12
BioSystems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
14
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
15
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
16
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
European Biophysics Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
18
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
SoftwareX
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
20
Biomacromolecules
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
21
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
22
Journal of Theoretical Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
23
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
207 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
24
The Journal of Chemical Physics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
25
Biosystems
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%