Back

Assessing spread risk of Wuhan novel coronavirus within and beyond China, January-April 2020: a travel network-based modelling study

Lai, S.; Bogoch, I.; Ruktanonchai, N.; Watts, A.; Li, Y.; Yu, J.; Lv, X.; Yang, W.; Yu, H.; Khan, K.; Li, Z.; Tatem, A. J.

2020-02-05 epidemiology
10.1101/2020.02.04.20020479
Show abstract

BackgroundA novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) emerged in Wuhan City, China, at the end of 2019 and has caused an outbreak of human-to-human transmission with a Public Health Emergency of International Concern declared by the World Health Organization on January 30, 2020. AimWe aimed to estimate the potential risk and geographic range of Wuhan novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) spread within and beyond China from January through to April, 2020. MethodsA series of domestic and international travel network-based connectivity and risk analyses were performed, by using de-identified and aggregated mobile phone data, air passenger itinerary data, and case reports. ResultsThe cordon sanitaire of Wuhan is likely to have occurred during the latter stages of peak population numbers leaving the city before Lunar New Year (LNY), with travellers departing into neighbouring cities and other megacities in China. We estimated that 59,912 air passengers, of which 834 (95% UI: 478 - 1349) had 2019-nCoV infection, travelled from Wuhan to 382 cities outside of mainland China during the two weeks prior to Wuhans lockdown. The majority of these cities were in Asia, but major hubs in Europe, the US and Australia were also prominent, with strong correlation seen between predicted importation risks and reported cases. Because significant spread has already occurred, a large number of airline travellers (3.3 million under the scenario of 75% travel reduction from normal volumes) may be required to be screened at origin high-risk cities in China and destinations across the globe for the following three months of February to April, 2020 to effectively limit spread beyond its current extent. ConclusionFurther spread of 2019-nCoV within China and international exportation is likely to occur. All countries, especially vulnerable regions, should be prepared for efforts to contain the 2019-nCoV infection.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Travel Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 0.1%
11.3%
2
Eurosurveillance
based on 77 papers
Top 0.6%
7.7%
3
Science
based on 46 papers
Top 1.0%
5.1%
4
Emerging Infectious Diseases
based on 84 papers
Top 2%
4.6%
5
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 7%
3.0%
6
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 2%
2.8%
7
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 10%
2.8%
8
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 79%
2.8%
9
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
2.8%
10
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 4%
2.8%
11
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 24%
2.5%
12
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 10%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
13
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 61%
2.5%
14
Clinical Infectious Diseases
based on 219 papers
Top 11%
2.5%
15
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 8%
2.5%
16
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
based on 57 papers
Top 3%
2.3%
17
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 10%
1.8%
18
BMC Infectious Diseases
based on 110 papers
Top 9%
1.6%
19
Epidemiology and Infection
based on 80 papers
Top 7%
1.3%
20
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
based on 36 papers
Top 1%
1.2%
21
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 47%
1.2%
22
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
based on 45 papers
Top 8%
1.2%
23
Nature
based on 58 papers
Top 9%
0.8%
24
Viruses
based on 79 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
25
Epidemics
based on 96 papers
Top 7%
0.8%
26
Journal of Medical Virology
based on 95 papers
Top 9%
0.8%
27
Journal of Infection
based on 64 papers
Top 8%
0.7%
28
The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
based on 14 papers
Top 0.3%
0.7%
29
Science of The Total Environment
based on 80 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
30
Public Health
based on 34 papers
Top 8%
0.7%