Back

Evolutionary context can clarify teleosts gene names

Gasanov, E.; Jedrychowska, J.; Kuznicki, J.; Korzh, V.

2020-02-06 genomics
10.1101/2020.02.02.931493 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The initial convention to name genes relied on historical precedent, order in the human genome or mutants in model systems. However, partial duplication of genes in teleosts required naming the duplicated genes, so ohnologs adopted the a or b extension. Rapid advances in deciphering the zebrafish genome in relation to the human genome instituted naming genes in all other fish genomes in the convention of zebrafish. Unfortunately, some ohnologs and their resembling orthologs suffered from incorrect nomenclature, which created confusion in particular instances like establishing disease models. We sought to overcome this barrier by establishing the ex silico evolutionary-based systematic approach to naming the ohnologs in teleosts and other fish. We compared gene synteny using the spotted gar genome as the reference, which represents the unduplicated ancestral state. Using new criteria, we identified several hundreds of potentially misnamed ohnologs and validated manually several ohnologs as a proof pf principle. This may help to establish a standard naming practice resulting in the improved evolutionary-based gene nomenclature. This approach may help to identify and rename ohnologs in all relevant EMBL-EBI and NCBI databases starting from the zebrafish genome to avoid further proliferation of misleading information.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Molecular Evolution
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
2
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
15.1%
3
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.9%
4
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 23%
4.4%
6
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.1%
9
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
10
Gene
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
11
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
12
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
14
Genomics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
15
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.5%
16
Molecular Immunology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
17
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
18
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Database
61 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
21
Open Biology
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
Gene Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
23
Human Mutation
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
24
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
25
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.6%