Back

Synchronized genetic activities in Alzheimer's brains revealed by heterogeneity-capturing network analysis

Climer, S.; Templeton, A. R.; Garvin, M.; Jacobson, D.; Lane, M.; Hulver, S.; Scheid, B.; Chen, Z.; Cruchaga, C.; Zhang, W.

2020-01-29 bioinformatics
10.1101/2020.01.28.923730 bioRxiv
Show abstract

It is becoming increasingly evident that the efficacy of single-gene computational analyses for complex traits is nearly exhausted and future advances hinge on unraveling the intricate combinatorial interactions among multiple genes. However, the discovery of modules of genes working in concert to manifest a complex trait has been crippled by combinatorial complexity, genetic heterogeneity, and validation biases. We introduce Maestro, a novel network approach that employs a multifaceted correlation measure, which captures heterogeneity, and a rigorous validation method. Maestros utilization for Alzheimers disease (AD) reveals an expression pattern that has virtually zero probability of simultaneous expression by an individual, assuming independence. Yet this pattern is exhibited by 19.0% of AD cases and 7.3% of controls, establishing an unprecedented pattern of synchronized genetic activities in the human brain. This pattern is significantly associated with AD, with an odds ratio of 3.0. This study substantiates Maestros power for discovery of orchestrated genetic activities underlying complex traits. More generally, Maestro can be applied in diverse domains in which heterogeneity exists. HighlightsO_LISynchronized genetic activities associated with Alzheimers disease C_LIO_LINovel vector-based correlation measure that captures genetic heterogeneity C_LIO_LIEnhanced network model for revealing combinatorial genetic interactions C_LIO_LIPro-survival genetic activities associated with Alzheimers disease C_LIO_LIGeneral approach for revealing patterns in data subject to heterogeneity C_LI

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.