Back

The Role of Spatial Separation on Selective and Distributed Attention to Speech

Pinto, D.; Agmon, G.; Zion Golumbic, E.

2020-01-28 neuroscience
10.1101/2020.01.27.920785 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWProcessing speech in multi-speaker environments poses substantial challenges to the human perceptual and attention system. Moreover, different contexts may require employing different listening strategies. For instance, in some cases individuals pay attention Selectively to one speaker and attempt to ignore all other task-irrelevant sounds, whereas other contexts may require listeners to Distribute their attention among several speakers. Spatial and spectral acoustic cues both play an important role in assisting listeners to segregate concurrent speakers. However, how these cues interact with varying demands for allocating top-down attention is less clear. In the current study, we test and compare how spatial cues are utilized to benefit performance on these different types of attentional tasks. To this end, participants listened to a concoction of two or four speakers, presented either as emanating from different locations in space or with no spatial separation. In separate trials, participants were required to employ different listening strategies, and detect a target-word spoken either by one pre-defined speaker (Selective Attention) or spoken by any of the speakers (Distributed Attention). Results indicate that the presence of spatial cues improved performance, particularly in the two-speaker condition, which is in line with the important role of spatial cues in stream segregation. However, spatial cues provided similar benefits to performance under Selective and Distributed attention. This pattern suggests that despite the advantage of spatial cues for stream segregation, they were nonetheless insufficient for directing a more focused attentional spotlight towards the location of a designated speaker in the Selective attention condition.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
28.6%
2
Trends in Hearing
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.1%
6
Hearing Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.7%
8
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.7%
10
Ear & Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
11
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
12
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
13
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
14
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
15
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
16
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
17
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
18
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
19
Neuroscience
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
20
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
21
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
Journal of Vision
92 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.5%
23
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%