Back

A Pilot Study of an Esophageal Cooling Device During Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Clark, B.; Alvi, N.; Hanks, J.; Suprenant, B.

2020-01-28 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2020.01.27.20019026 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEsophageal thermal injury is a risk of ablation of the posterior left atrium despite various devices utilized to date. ObjectiveEvaluate the potential of a commercially-available esophageal cooling device to provide esophageal protection during left atrial catheter ablation. MethodsIn this pilot study, we randomized 6 patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Three patients received standard of care for our site (use of a single-sensor temperature probe, with adjunct iced-water instillation for any temperature increases >1{degrees}C). Three patients received standard ablation after placement of the esophageal cooling device using a circulating water temperature of 4{degrees}C. All patients underwent transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) and esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) on the day prior to ablation followed by EGD on the day after. ResultsIn the 3 control patients, one had no evidence of esophageal mucosal damage, one had diffuse sloughing of the esophageal mucosa and multiple ulcerations, and one had a superficial ulcer with large clot. Both patients with lesions were classified as Zargar 2a. In the 3 patients treated with the cooling device, one had no evidence of esophageal mucosal damage, one had esophageal erythema (Zargar 1), and one had a solitary Zargar 2a lesion. At 3-month follow-up, 1 patient in each group had recurrence of atrial fibrillation. ConclusionsThe extent of esophageal injury was less severe with a commercially available esophageal cooling device than with reactive instillation of ice-cold water. This pilot study supports further evaluation with a larger clinical trial.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.