Back

Transmission dynamics of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)

Liu, T.; Hu, J.; Kang, M.; Lin, L.; Zhong, H.; Xiao, J.; He, G.; Song, T.; Huang, Q.; Rong, Z.; Deng, A.; Zeng, W.; Tan, X.; Zeng, S.; Zhu, Z.; Li, J.; Wan, D.; Lu, J.; Deng, H.; He, J.; Ma, W.

2020-01-26 systems biology
10.1101/2020.01.25.919787 bioRxiv
Show abstract

RationaleSeveral studies have estimated basic production number of novel coronavirus pneumonia (NCP). However, the time-varying transmission dynamics of NCP during the outbreak remain unclear. ObjectivesWe aimed to estimate the basic and time-varying transmission dynamics of NCP across China, and compared them with SARS. MethodsData on NCP cases by February 7, 2020 were collected from epidemiological investigations or official websites. Data on severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) cases in Guangdong Province, Beijing and Hong Kong during 2002-2003 were also obtained. We estimated the doubling time, basic reproduction number (R0) and time-varying reproduction number (Rt) of NCP and SARS. Measurements and main resultsAs of February 7, 2020, 34,598 NCP cases were identified in China, and daily confirmed cases decreased after February 4. The doubling time of NCP nationwide was 2.4 days which was shorter than that of SARS in Guangdong (14.3 days), Hong Kong (5.7 days) and Beijing (12.4 days). The R0 of NCP cases nationwide and in Wuhan were 4.5 and 4.4 respectively, which were higher than R0 of SARS in Guangdong (R0=2.3), Hongkong (R0=2.3), and Beijing (R0=2.6). The Rt for NCP continuously decreased especially after January 16 nationwide and in Wuhan. The R0 for secondary NCP cases in Guangdong was 0.6, and the Rt values were less than 1 during the epidemic. ConclusionsNCP may have a higher transmissibility than SARS, and the efforts of containing the outbreak are effective. However, the efforts are needed to persist in for reducing time-varying reproduction number below one. At a Glance CommentaryO_ST_ABSScientific Knowledge on the SubjectC_ST_ABSSince December 29, 2019, pneumonia infection with 2019-nCoV, now named as Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (NCP), occurred in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. The disease has rapidly spread from Wuhan to other areas. As a novel virus, the time-varying transmission dynamics of NCP remain unclear, and it is also important to compare it with SARS. What This Study Adds to the FieldWe compared the transmission dynamics of NCP with SARS, and found that NCP has a higher transmissibility than SARS. Time-varying production number indicates that rigorous control measures taken by governments are effective across China, and persistent efforts are needed to be taken for reducing instantaneous reproduction number below one.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.1%
2
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.4%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.3%
4
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.7%
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.8%
6
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
126 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
7
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
8
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
9
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
12
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
13
The Innovation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
15
Emerging Microbes & Infections
74 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.8%
16
Science China Life Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
17
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
18
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
19
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.4%
20
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
21
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Database
51 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
25
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.8%
28
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
29
Health Science Reports
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
30
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%