Back

Middle-level IM-MS and CIU experiments for improved therapeutic immunoglobulin isotype fingerprinting

Botzanowski, T.; HERNANDEZ-ALBA, O.; Malissard, M.; Wagner-Rousset, E.; Desligniere, E.; Colas, O.; Haeuw, J.-F.; Beck, A.; CIANFERANI, S.

2020-01-21 biophysics
10.1101/2020.01.20.911750 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Currently approved therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are based on immunoglobulin G (IgG) 1, 2 or 4 isotypes, which differ in their specific inter-chains disulfide bridge connectivities. Different analytical techniques have been reported for mAb isotyping, among which native ion mobility mass spectrometry (IM-MS) and collision induced unfolding (CIU) experiments. However, mAb isotyping by these approaches is based on detection of subtle differences and thus remains challenging at the intactlevel. We report here on middle-level (after IdeS digestion) IM-MS and CIU approaches to afford better differentiation of mAb isotypes. Our method provides simultaneously CIU patterns of F(ab)2 and Fc domains within a single run. Middle-level CIU patterns of F(ab)2 domains enable more reliable classification of mAb isotypes compared to intact level CIU, while CIU fingerprints of Fc domains are overall less informative for mAb isotyping. F(ab)2 regions can thus be considered as diagnostic domains providing specific CIU signatures for mAb isotyping. Benefits of middle-level IM-MS and CIU approaches are further illustrated on the hybrid IgG2/IgG4 eculizumab. While classical analytical techniques led to controversial results, middle-level CIU uniquely allowed to face the challenge of eculizumab << hybridicity >>, highlighting that its F(ab)2 and Fc CIU patterns corresponds to an IgG2 and an IgG4, respectively. Altogether, the middle-level CIU approach is more clear-cut, accurate and straightforward for canonical but also more complex, engineered next generation mAb formats isotyping. Middle-level CIU thus constitutes a real breakthrough for therapeutic protein analysis, paving the way for its implementation in R&D laboratories.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
41.5%
2
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
3.0%
4
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
PROTEOMICS
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
6
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
7
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
8
JACS Au
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
9
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
10
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
12
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
14
Chemistry – A European Journal
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
15
Communications Chemistry
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
16
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.0%
18
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
20
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
21
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
22
ACS Central Science
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
24
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
158 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.8%
27
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
28
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%