Back

CluStrat: a structure informed clustering strategy for population stratification

Bose, A.; Burch, M. C.; Chowdhury, A.; Paschou, P.; Drineas, P.

2020-01-16 genetics
10.1101/2020.01.15.908228 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been extensively used to estimate the signed effects of trait-associated alleles. Recent independent studies failed to replicate the strong evidence of selection for height across Europe implying the shortcomings of standard population stratification correction approaches. Here, we present CluStrat, a stratification correction algorithm for complex population structure that leverages the linkage disequilibrium (LD)-induced distances between individuals. CluStrat performs agglomerative hierarchical clustering using the Mahalanobis distance and then applies sketching-based randomized ridge regression on the genotype data to obtain the association statistics. With the growing size of data, computing and storing the genome wide covariance matrix is a non-trivial task. We get around this overhead by computing the GRM directly using a connection between statistical leverage scores and the Mahalanobis distance. We test CluStrat on a large simulation study of discrete and admixed, arbitrarily-structured sub-populations identifying two to three-fold more true causal variants when compared to Principal Component (PC) based stratification correction methods while trading off for a slightly higher spurious associations. Applying CluStrat on WTCCC2 Parkinsons disease (PD) data, we identified loci mapped to a host of genes associated with PD such as BACH2, MAP2, NR4A2, SLC11A1, UNC5C to name a few. Availability and ImplementationCluStrat source code and user manual is available at: https://github.com/aritra90/CluStrat

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.