BioFabric Visualization of Network Alignments
Desai, R. M.; Longabaugh, W. J. R.; Hayes, W. B.
Show abstract
BackgroundDozens of global network alignment algorithms have been developed over the past fifteen years. Effective network visualization tools are lacking and would enhance our ability to gain an intuitive understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of these algorithms. ResultsWe have created a plugin to the existing network visualization tool BioFabric, called VISNAB: Visualization of Network Alignments using BioFabric. We leverage BioFabrics unique approach to layout (nodes are horizontal lines connected by vertical lines representing edges) to improve understanding of network alignment performance. Our visualization tool allows the user to clearly spot deficiencies in alignments that cannot be detected through simply evaluating and comparing standard numerical topological measures such as the Edge Coverage (EC) or Symmetric Substructure Score (S3). Furthermore, we provide new automatic layouts that allow researchers to identify problem areas in an alignment. Finally, our new definitions of node groups and link groups that arise from our visualization technique allows us to also introduce novel numeric measures for assessing alignment quality. ConclusionsOur new approach to visualize network alignments will allow researchers to gain a new, and better, understanding of the strengths and shortcomings of the many available network alignment algorithms.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Weighted Network Analysis Framework for the Hourglass Effect - and its Application in the C. Elegans Connectome 94%
- ProteinWeaver: A Webtool to Visualize Ontology-Annotated Protein Networks 94%
- Voting-based integration algorithm improves causal network learning from interventional and observational data: an application to cell signaling network inference 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.