Back

Simulation-based comprehensive study of batch effects in metabolomics studies

Yu, M.; Roszkowska, A.; Pawliszyn, J.

2019-12-17 bioinformatics
10.1101/2019.12.16.878637 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Batch effects will influence the interpretation of metabolomics data. In order to avoid misleading results, batch effects should be corrected and normalized prior to statistical analysis. Metabolomics studies are usually performed without targeted compounds (e.g., internal standards) and it is a challenging task to validate batch effects correction methods. In addition, statistical properties of metabolomics data are quite different from genomics data (where most of the currently used batch correction methods have originated from). In this study, we firstly analyzed already published metabolomics datasets so as to summarize and discuss their statistical properties. Then, based on available datasets, we developed novel statistical properties-based in silico simulations of metabolomics peaks intensity data so as to analyze the influence of batch effects on metabolomic data with the use of currently available batch correction strategies. Overall, 252000 batch corrections on 14000 different in silico simulated datasets and related differential analyses were performed in order to evaluate and validate various batch correction methods. The obtained results indicate that log transformations strongly influence the performance of all investigated batch correction methods. False positive rates increased after application of batch correction methods with almost no improvement on true positive rates among the analyzed batch correction methods. Hence, in metabolomic studies it is recommended to implement preliminary experiments to simulate batch effects from real data in order to select adequate batch correction method, based on a given distribution of peaks intensity. The presented study is reproducible and related R package mzrtsim software can be found online (https://github.com/yufree/mzrtsim).

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.