Making Densenet Interpretable A Case Study In Clinical Radiology
Ngan, K. H.; Garcez, A. d.; Knapp, K. M.; Appelboam, A.; Reyes-Aldasoro, C. C.
Show abstract
The monotonous routine of medical image analysis under tight time constraints has always led to work fatigue for many medical practitioners. Medical image interpretation can be error-prone and this can increase the risk of an incorrect procedure being recommended. While the advancement of complex deep learning models has achieved performance beyond human capability in some computer vision tasks, widespread adoption in the medical field has been held back, among other factors, by poor model interpretability and a lack of high-quality labelled data. This paper introduces a model interpretation and visualisation framework for the analysis of the feature extraction process of a deep convolutional neural network and applies it to abnormality detection using the musculoskeletal radiograph dataset (MURA, Stanford). The proposed framework provides a mechanism for interpreting DenseNet deep learning architectures. It aims to provide a deeper insight about the paths of feature generation and reasoning within a DenseNet architecture. When evaluated on MURA at abnormality detection tasks, the model interpretation framework has been shown capable of identifying limitations in the reasoning of a DenseNet architecture applied to radiography, which can in turn be ameliorated through model interpretation and visualization.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Semantic Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images through Image Preprocessing: ps-KDE for Pixel-wise Substitution by Kernel Density Estimation 96%
- Automated Detection of COVID-19 through Convolutional Neural Network using Chest x-ray images 95%
- ai-corona : Radiologist-Assistant Deep Learning Framework for COVID-19 Diagnosis in Chest CT Scans 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effective Deep Learning Approaches for Predicting COVID-19 Outcomes from Chest Computed Tomography Volumes 95%
- Tracking And Predicting COVID-19 Radiological Trajectory Using Deep Learning On Chest X-Rays: Initial Accuracy Testing 94%
- COVID-Classifier: An automated machine learning model to assist in the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection in chest x-ray images 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Bayesian automatic screening of pneumoniaand lung lesions localization from CT scans. Acombined method toward a more user-centredand explainable approach 95%
- A computationally efficient approach to segmentation of the aorta and coronary arteries using deep learning 94%
- An Accurate and Explainable Deep Learning System Improves Interobserver Agreement in the Interpretation of Chest Radiograph 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Classification and Visualisation of Normal and Abnormal Radiographs; a comparison between Eleven Convolutional Neural Network Architectures 96%
- Deep learning models for COVID-19 infected area segmentation in CT images 95%
- High-Throughput and Accurate 3D Scanning of Cattle Using Time-of-Flight Sensors and Deep Learning 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Effect of Image Resolution on Automated Classification of Chest X-rays 95%
- A 3D CNN Classification Model for Accurate Diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 using Computed Tomography Images 94%
- Fiberscopic Pattern Removal for Optimal Coverage in 3D Bladder Reconstructions of Fiberscope Cystoscopy Videos 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.