Back

Making Densenet Interpretable A Case Study In Clinical Radiology

Ngan, K. H.; Garcez, A. d.; Knapp, K. M.; Appelboam, A.; Reyes-Aldasoro, C. C.

2019-12-05 radiology and imaging
10.1101/19013730
Show abstract

The monotonous routine of medical image analysis under tight time constraints has always led to work fatigue for many medical practitioners. Medical image interpretation can be error-prone and this can increase the risk of an incorrect procedure being recommended. While the advancement of complex deep learning models has achieved performance beyond human capability in some computer vision tasks, widespread adoption in the medical field has been held back, among other factors, by poor model interpretability and a lack of high-quality labelled data. This paper introduces a model interpretation and visualisation framework for the analysis of the feature extraction process of a deep convolutional neural network and applies it to abnormality detection using the musculoskeletal radiograph dataset (MURA, Stanford). The proposed framework provides a mechanism for interpreting DenseNet deep learning architectures. It aims to provide a deeper insight about the paths of feature generation and reasoning within a DenseNet architecture. When evaluated on MURA at abnormality detection tasks, the model interpretation framework has been shown capable of identifying limitations in the reasoning of a DenseNet architecture applied to radiography, which can in turn be ameliorated through model interpretation and visualization.

Matching journals

1
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 31%
15.6%
2
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 7%
2.7× avg
3
European Radiology
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.6%
56× avg
4
PLOS Digital Health
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 88 published papers
Top 2%
14× avg
5
IEEE Access
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) · based on 11 published papers
#1
100× avg
6
Computers in Biology and Medicine
Elsevier BV · based on 39 published papers
Top 0.8%
21× avg
7
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.4%
33× avg
8
npj Digital Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 85 published papers
Top 6%
3.7× avg
9
Sensors
MDPI AG · based on 18 published papers
Top 0.8%
20× avg
10
Diagnostics
MDPI AG · based on 36 published papers
Top 2%
12× avg
11
JMIRx Med
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 29 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
12
Scientific Data
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 30 published papers
Top 1%
15× avg
13
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 15 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
14
Nature Communications
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 483 published papers
Top 31%
1.6%
15
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
Fortune Journals · based on 18 published papers
Top 1.0%
13× avg
16
Human Brain Mapping
Wiley · based on 53 published papers
Top 5%
3.9× avg
17
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
Frontiers Media SA · based on 11 published papers
Top 2%
15× avg
18
NeuroImage
Elsevier BV · based on 36 published papers
Top 3%
6.6× avg
19
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Wiley · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
11× avg
20
The Lancet Digital Health
Elsevier BV · based on 25 published papers
Top 4%
4.3× avg
21
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 14 published papers
Top 2%
5.5× avg
22
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) · based on 14 published papers
Top 4%
5.4× avg
23
Frontiers in Digital Health
Frontiers Media SA · based on 18 published papers
Top 5%
4.9× avg
24
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Wiley · based on 10 published papers
Top 2%
8.9× avg
25
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Elsevier BV · based on 12 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
26
Patterns
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 3%
7.1× avg