Back

Making Densenet Interpretable A Case Study In Clinical Radiology

Ngan, K. H.; Garcez, A. d.; Knapp, K. M.; Appelboam, A.; Reyes-Aldasoro, C. C.

2019-12-05 radiology and imaging
10.1101/19013730 medRxiv
Show abstract

The monotonous routine of medical image analysis under tight time constraints has always led to work fatigue for many medical practitioners. Medical image interpretation can be error-prone and this can increase the risk of an incorrect procedure being recommended. While the advancement of complex deep learning models has achieved performance beyond human capability in some computer vision tasks, widespread adoption in the medical field has been held back, among other factors, by poor model interpretability and a lack of high-quality labelled data. This paper introduces a model interpretation and visualisation framework for the analysis of the feature extraction process of a deep convolutional neural network and applies it to abnormality detection using the musculoskeletal radiograph dataset (MURA, Stanford). The proposed framework provides a mechanism for interpreting DenseNet deep learning architectures. It aims to provide a deeper insight about the paths of feature generation and reasoning within a DenseNet architecture. When evaluated on MURA at abnormality detection tasks, the model interpretation framework has been shown capable of identifying limitations in the reasoning of a DenseNet architecture applied to radiography, which can in turn be ameliorated through model interpretation and visualization.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 10%
8.3%
2
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
3
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.2%
6
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
7
Journal of Medical Imaging
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
8
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.2%
9
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
10
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
11
Neurocomputing
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
12
Expert Systems with Applications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
13
European Radiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
14
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
53 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.0%
15
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.7%
17
Neuroinformatics
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
18
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.6%
19
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
20
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
21
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
22
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
23
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
24
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
25
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
26
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
27
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
28
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.7%
29
Biomedical Optics Express
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
30
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%