Transdiagnostic expression of interoceptive abnormalities in psychiatric conditions
Critchley, H. D.; Ewing, D. L.; Gould van Praag, C.; Habash-Bailey, H.; Eccles, J. A.; Meeten, F.; Garfinkel, S. N.
Show abstract
BackgroundInteroception, the sensing of information about the internal physiological state of the body, is proposed to be fundamental to normal and abnormal affective feelings. We undertook a cross-sectional characterisation of cardiac interoception in patients accessing secondary mental health services to understand how interoceptive abnormalities relate to psychiatric symptoms and diagnoses. MethodsPatients attending adult mental health services (205 female, 101 male) and controls (42 female, 21 male) participated. Clinical diagnoses spanned affective disorders, personality disorders and psychoses. Physiological, bio-behavioural and subjective interoceptive measures included: 1) Basal heart rate and heart rate variability (HRV); 2) cardiac afferent effects on emotional processing (cardiac cycle modulation of ratings of fear vs. neutral faces); 3) perceptual accuracy, confidence, and metacognitive insight in heartbeat detection, and; 4) self-reported sensitivity to internal bodily sensations. We tested for transdiagnostic differences between patients and controls, then for correlations between interoceptive measures and affective symptoms, and for group differences across clinical diagnostic categories. ResultsPatients differed from controls in HRV, cardiac afferent effects on emotional processing, heartbeat discrimination accuracy, and heartbeat detection confidence. Anxiety and depression symptom severity correlated particularly with self-reported sensitivity to interoceptive experiences. Significant differences between diagnostic categories were observed for HRV, cardiac afferent effects on emotional processing, and subjective interoception. Patients with schizophrenia relative to other diagnoses intriguingly showed opposite cardiac afferent effects on emotion processing. ConclusionsThis multilevel characterisation identified interoceptive differences associated with psychiatric symptoms and diagnoses. Interoceptive mechanisms have potential value for the clinical stratification and therapeutic targeting of psychiatric disorders.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Systematic Review on Psychological and Biological Mediators Between Adversity and Psychosis: Potential Targets for Treatment 93%
- Jumping To Conclusions, General Intelligence, And Psychosis Liability: Findings From The Multicentric EU-GEI Case-Control Study 93%
- Increased Insular Functional Connectivity During Repetitive Negative Thinking in Major Depression and Healthy Volunteers 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Which traits predict elevated distress during the Covid-19 pandemic? Results from a large, longitudinal cohort study with psychiatric patients and healthy controls 94%
- Multidimensional apathy: A simple and inclusive clinical marker of youth mental health—A longitudinal study 94%
- Increased resting-state functional connectivity within theta and alpha frequency bands in dysphoria: Towards a novel measure of depression risk 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Cardiac structure and function in patients with schizophrenia taking antipsychotic drugs: an MRI study 93%
- Schizophrenia Polygenic Risk Score and 20-Year Course of Illness in Psychotic Disorders 93%
- Metabolic Disturbances, Hemoglobin A1c, and Social Cognition Impairment in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Theta phase synchrony is sensitive to corollary discharge abnormalities in early illness schizophrenia but not in the clinical high-risk syndrome 94%
- Latent Factors of Language Disturbance and Relationships to Quantitative Speech Features 93%
- Motor and Activity Psychosis-Risk (MAP-R) Scale: An exploration of scale structure with replication and validation 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.