Analysis of online information available for treatment of depression
Ghezzi, P.; Clarke, Z.
Show abstract
The Internet has become a prime source of health information available to the public. Our aims were to assess the content and quality of online information for the treatment of depression. We searched, "How to cure depression" on Google and analysed the first 200 websites according to the website typology and a standard health information assessment tool, the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) criteria (presence of authorship, date, disclosure, and references). We also analyzed content in terms of treatments mentioned and developed a Quality Indicator Score (QIS) based on the guidelines for treating depression from the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). News websites were the most frequent typology followed by health portals, non-profit, professional and government; commercial websites were the least represented. In the top ten websites, news and health portals remained first and second respectively. Antidepressants were the most mentioned treatment, followed by psychotherapy, lifestyle & exercise, social support, diet. The least mentioned interventions were sunlight & light therapy, routine, and ketamine & psychedelics. Commercial websites preferentially mentioned supplements, while ketamine and psychedelic drugs were the most covered by news outlets. Analysing webpages according to our QIS showed the median of NICE recommended treatments was 2.5 out of 5 possible treatments: antidepressants, lifestyle & exercise, psychotherapy, social support and ECT. Government websites had the highest QIS, news and commercial websites the lowest. Webpages with high QIS ranked higher in Google.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic Review Protocol: The Effects of Theory-Based Interventions for Self-Help Practices in the Management of Mild to Moderate Depression 93%
- Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Interventions Promoting Recovery from Depression for Patients Transitioning from Outpatient Mental Health Services to Primary Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring the Efficacy and Potential of Large Language Models for Depression: A Systematic Review 92%
- Is Google Trends a useful tool for tracking mental and social distress during a public health emergency? A time-series analysis 91%
- Examining the association between family status and depression in the UK Biobank 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness, acceptability and potential harms of peer support for self-harm in non-clinical settings: A systematic review 91%
- The prevalence, incidence, prognosis and risk factors for depression and anxiety in a UK cohort during the COVID-19 pandemic 91%
- Risk of Depression in Family Caregivers: Unintended Consequence of COVID-19 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- An overview of current mental health in the general population of Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from the COLLATE project 91%
- Prevalence and Predictors of General Psychiatric Disorders and Loneliness during COVID-19 in the United Kingdom: Results from the Understanding Society UKHLS 90%
- The prevalence, incidence and risk factors of mental health problems and mental health services use before and 9 months after the COVID-19 outbreak among the general Dutch population. A 3-wave prospective study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The use of social media and online dating among individuals with unipolar depression and bipolar disorder 91%
- Lexical Stability of Psychiatric Clinical Notes from Electronic Health Records over a Decade 90%
- Predicting the need for electroconvulsive therapy via machine learning trained on electronic health record data 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.