Back

Peripheral Blood As Tool To Determine Gene Expression Patterns In Patients With Psychiatric, Neurological And Other Common Disorders: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis Protocol

Panzenhagen, A. C.; Alves-Teixeira, A.; Wissmann, M. S.; Girardi, C. S.; Santos, L.; Silveira, A. K.; Gelain, D. P.; Moreira, J. C. F.

2019-10-05 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.1101/19007633 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionCommon diseases are influenced by a variety of factors that can enhance one persons susceptibility to developing a specific condition. Complex traits have been investigated in several biological levels. One that reflects the high interconnectivity and interaction of genes, proteins and transcription factors is the transcriptome. In this study, we disclose the protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis aiming at summarizing the available evidence regarding transcriptomic gene expression levels of peripheral blood samples comparing subjects with psychiatric, neurological and other common disorders to healthy controls. Methods and analysisThe investigation of the transcriptomic levels in the peripheral blood enables the unique opportunity to unravel the etiology of common diseases in patients ex-vivo. However, the experimental results should be minimally consistent across studies for them to be considered as the best approximation of the true effect. In order to test this, we will systematically identify all transcriptome studies that compared subjects with common disorders to their respective control samples. We will apply meta-analyses to assess the overall differentially expressed genes throughout the studies of each condition. Ethics and disseminationThe data that will be used to conduct this study are available online and have already been published following their own ethical laws. Therefore this study requires no further ethical approval. The results of this study will be published in leading peer-reviewed journals of the area and also presented at relevant national and international conferences. Strengths and limitations of this study We present a new and systematically centered method to assess the overall effect of transcriptomic levels in the blood of subjects with common conditions. Meta-analyses are a robust statistical method to assess effect sizes across studies. The analysis is limited by the availability of studies, as well as their quality and comprehensiveness. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses will be also limited by the amount and quality of sample characterization variables made available by original studies.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.3%
2
Psychiatry Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.3%
3
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
4
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 29%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Translational Psychiatry
219 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
7
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
8
BMC Psychiatry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
Molecular Psychiatry
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
10
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
11
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
12
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
13
Brain Sciences
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
14
Journal of Psychopharmacology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
15
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
16
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
17
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
18
European Psychiatry
10 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
19
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
20
BJPsych Open
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Psychological Medicine
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
27
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 77%
0.7%
28
Schizophrenia Research
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
29
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%