Back

Neuropsychological stratification of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: building affect into clinically relevant neuro-biomarkers of breathlessness

Finnegan, S. L.; Faull, O. K.; Harmer, C. J.; Herigstad, M.; Rahman, N. M.; Reinecke, A.; Pattinson, K. T. S.

2019-09-23 respiratory medicine
10.1101/19006684 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundChronic breathlessness profoundly affects quality of life for its sufferers. Often, reported breathlessness is inconsistent with airway pathophysiology and objective disease markers. While a mechanistic understanding of this discordance has thus far remained elusive, factors such as mood, attention and expectation have all been implicated as important perceptual modulators. Therefore, here we have developed a model capable of exploring these relationships aiding patient stratification and revealing clinically-relevant neuro-biomarkers. MethodsA cohort of 100 participants with mild-to-moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) underwent a comprehensive assessment that included functional brain imaging while viewing and rating breathlessness-related word cues, self-report questionnaires and clinical measures. ResultsUsing an exploratory factor analysis across psychological and physiological measures, we identified two distinctive neuropsychological behavioural profiles that differed across four key factors corresponding to mood, symptom burden, and two capability measures. These profiles stratified participants into high and low symptom groups, which did not differ in spirometry values. The low symptom load group demonstrated greater FMRI activity to breathlessness-related word cues in the anterior insula. ConclusionsOur findings reveal two clear groups of individuals within our COPD cohort, divided by behavioural rather than clinical factors. Furthermore, indices of depression, anxiety, vigilance and perceived capability were linked to differences in brain activity within key regions thought to be involved in monitoring bodily sensations (interoception). These findings demonstrate the complex relationship between affect and interoceptive processing, providing the foundations for the development of targeted treatment programmes that harness clinical and symptom-relevant biomarkers.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.4%
2
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 11%
7.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
Respiratory Research
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.4%
6
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.8%
7
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
8
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
9
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
10
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.5%
11
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
12
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
13
Critical Care
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
14
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
15
NeuroImage: Clinical
132 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
16
Journal of Applied Physiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
17
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
18
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
19
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
20
American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
21
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 48%
0.5%
23
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.5%
24
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%
25
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%