Back

Dose-dependent degeneration of non-cancerous brain tissue in post-radiotherapy patients: A diffusion tensor imaging study

David, S.; Mesri, H. Y.; Bodiut, V. A.; Nagtegaal, S. H. J.; Elhalawani, H.; de Luca, A.; Philippens, M. E. P.; Viergever, M. A.; Mohamed, A. S. R.; Ding, Y.; Chung, C.; Fuller, C. D.; Verhoeff, J. J. C.; Leemans, A.

2019-09-16 oncology
10.1101/19005157 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and purposeRadiation-induced changes in brain tissue may relate to post-radiotherapy (RT) cognitive decline. Our aim is to investigate changes of the brain microstructural properties after exposure to radiation during clinical protocols of RT using diffusion MRI (dMRI). Methods and MaterialsThe susceptibility of tissue changes to radiation was investigated in a clinically heterogenic cohort (age, pathology, tumor location, type of surgery) consisting of 121 scans of 18 patients (10 females). The imaging dataset included 18 planning CTs and 103 dMRI scans (range 2-14, median = 6 per patient) assessing pre-operative, post-operative pre-RT and post-RT states. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) metrics were estimated from all scans for a region-of-interest based linear relation analysis between mean dose and change in DTI metrics, while partial volume effects were regressed out. ResultsThe largest regional dose dependency with mean diffusivity appear in the white matter of the frontal pole in the left hemisphere by an increase of 2.61 %/(Gy x year). Full brain-wise, pooled results for white matter show fractional anisotropy to decrease by 0.85 %/(30Gy x year); mean diffusivity increase by 9.17 %/(30Gy x year); axial diffusivity increase by 7.30%/(30Gy x year) and radial diffusivity increases by 10.63%/(30Gy x year). ConclusionsWhite matter is susceptible to radiation with some regional variability where diffusivity metrics demonstrate the largest relative sensitivity. This suggests that dMRI is a promising tool in assessing microstructural changes after RT, which can help in understanding treatment-induced cognitive decline.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.7%
2
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.0%
3
Radiotherapy and Oncology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 16%
5.5%
5
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.2%
7
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
8
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
9
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.5%
10
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
11
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
12
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
13
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
14
Physics in Medicine & Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
15
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
16
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
17
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
18
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
19
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
20
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
21
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
22
Neuro-Oncology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%