Back

Medal: a patient similarity metric using medication prescribing patterns

Lopez Pineda, A.; Pourshafeie, A.; Ioannidis, A.; McCloskey Leibold, C.; Chan, A.; Frankovich, J.; Bustamante, C. D.; Wojcik, G. L.

2019-08-17 health informatics
10.1101/19004440 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivePediatric acute-onset neuropsychiatric syndrome (PANS) is a complex neuropsychiatric syndrome characterized by an abrupt onset of obsessive-compulsive symptoms and/or severe eating restrictions, along with at least two concomitant debilitating cognitive, behavioral, or neurological symptoms. A wide range of pharmacological interventions along with behavioral and environmental modifications, and psychotherapies have been adopted to treat symptoms and underlying etiologies. Our goal was to develop a data-driven approach to identify treatment patterns in this cohort. Materials and MethodsIn this cohort study, we extracted medical prescription histories from electronic health records. We developed a modified dynamic programming approach to perform global alignment of those medication histories. Our approach is unique since it considers time gaps in prescription patterns as part of the similarity strategy. ResultsThis study included 43 consecutive new-onset pre-pubertal patients who had at least 3 clinic visits. Our algorithm identified six clusters with distinct medication usage history which may represent clinicians practice of treating PANS of different severities and etiologies i.e., two most severe groups requiring high dose intravenous steroids; two arthritic or inflammatory groups requiring prolonged nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID); and two mild relapsing/remitting group treated with a short course of NSAID. The psychometric scores as outcomes in each cluster generally improved within the first two years. Discussion and conclusionOur algorithm shows potential to improve our knowledge of treatment patterns in the PANS cohort, while helping clinicians understand how patients respond to a combination of drugs.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
3
International Journal of Medical Informatics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
4
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.4%
5
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.0%
6
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
8
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
9
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
10
JAMIA Open
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.3%
11
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
12
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
14
Journal of Affective Disorders
81 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
15
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
16
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
18
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
19
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Pharmaceuticals
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
24
JMIR Medical Informatics
17 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
Pharmaceutics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
28
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
30
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%