Back

Metagenomic identification of severe pneumonia pathogens with rapid Nanopore sequencing in mechanically-ventilated patients.

Yang, L.; Haidar, G.; Zia, H.; Nettles, R.; Qin, S.; Wang, X.; Shah, F.; Rapport, S. F.; Charalampous, T.; Methe, B.; Fitch, A.; Morris, A.; McVerry, B. J.; O'Grady, J.; Kitsios, G. D.

2019-07-24 respiratory medicine
10.1101/19002774
Show abstract

BackgroundMetagenomic sequencing of respiratory microbial communities for etiologic pathogen identification in pneumonia may help overcome the limitations of current culture-based methods. We examined the feasibility and clinical validity of rapid-turnaround metagenomics with Nanopore sequencing of respiratory samples for severe pneumonia diagnosis. Methods and FindingsWe conducted a case-control study of mechanically-ventilated patients with pneumonia (nine culture-positive and five culture-negative) and without pneumonia (eight controls). We collected endotracheal aspirate samples (ETAs) and applied a microbial DNA enrichment method prior to performing metagenomic sequencing with the Oxford Nanopore MinION device. We compared Nanopore results against clinical microbiologic cultures and bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequencing. In nine culture-positive cases, Nanopore revealed communities with low alpha diversity and high abundance of the bacterial (n=8) or fungal (n=1) species isolated by clinical cultures. In four culture-positive cases with resistant organisms, Nanopore detected antibiotic resistance genes corresponding to the phenotypic resistance identified by clinical antibiograms. In culture-negative pneumonia, Nanopore revealed probable bacterial pathogens in 1/5 cases and airway colonization by Candida species in 3/5 cases. In controls, Nanopore showed high abundance of oral bacteria in 5/8 subjects, and identified colonizing respiratory pathogens in the three other subjects. Nanopore and 16S sequencing showed excellent concordance for the most abundant bacterial taxa. ConclusionWe demonstrated technical feasibility and proof-of-concept clinical validity of Nanopore metagenomics for severe pneumonia diagnosis, with striking concordance with positive microbiologic cultures and clinically actionable information offered from the sequencing profiles of culture-negative samples. Prospective studies with real-time metagenomics are warranted to examine the impact on antimicrobial decision-making and clinical outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
based on 77 papers
Top 0.3%
16.0%
2
Respiratory Research
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
11.7%
3
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 14%
10.6%
4
European Respiratory Journal
based on 44 papers
Top 0.6%
10.6%
5
Microbiology Spectrum
based on 86 papers
Top 0.3%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
The Lancet Microbe
based on 33 papers
Top 0.3%
3.1%
7
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
based on 23 papers
Top 0.5%
3.1%
8
iScience
based on 74 papers
Top 2%
2.5%
9
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 84%
2.4%
10
ERJ Open Research
based on 36 papers
Top 1%
2.4%
11
Thorax
based on 29 papers
Top 1%
1.8%
12
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
based on 15 papers
Top 0.8%
1.8%
13
Journal of Cystic Fibrosis
based on 10 papers
Top 0.4%
1.6%
14
Viruses
based on 79 papers
Top 3%
1.4%
15
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
based on 32 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
16
Critical Care
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
1.2%
17
The American Journal of Pathology
based on 11 papers
Top 1.0%
0.8%
18
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
based on 124 papers
Top 9%
0.8%
19
Genome Medicine
based on 56 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 17%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
based on 10 papers
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
Journal of Clinical Virology
based on 54 papers
Top 4%
0.7%
23
mBio
based on 34 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
24
New England Journal of Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 4%
0.7%